Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

v2.4.1.9
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES [Abstract]  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

9.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Litigation Matters

In the ordinary course of its operations, the Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various legal proceedings.  Based on the information presently available, and after consultation with legal counsel, management believes that the ultimate outcome in such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the business,  the financial condition, or results of operations of the Company.

 

Litigation Relating to the StellarOne Acquisition

 

In a press release issued on June 10, 2013, the Company announced the signing of a definitive merger agreement for the acquisition of StellarOne.  The Company closed the acquisition of StellarOne on January 1, 2014. On June 14, 2013, in response to the initial announcement of the definitive merger agreement, Jaclyn Crescente, individually and on behalf of all other StellarOne shareholders, filed a class action complaint against StellarOne, its current directors, StellarOne Bank, and the Company, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Charlottesville Division (Case No. 3:13-cv-00021-NKM) (the “District Court”).  The complaint alleged that the StellarOne directors breached their fiduciary duties by approving the merger with the Company and that the Company aided and abetted in such breaches of duty.  The complaint sought, among other things, money damages.  StellarOne and the Company believed that the claims were without merit; however, in order to eliminate the expense and uncertainties of further litigation, all the defendants entered into a memorandum of understanding with the plaintiffs in order to settle the litigation prior to the merger. Under the terms of the memorandum of understanding, the plaintiffs agreed to settle the lawsuit and release the defendants from all claims,  subject to approval by the District Court.  On May 19, 2014, the District Court approved the memorandum of understanding and the class action settlement in the case.

Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk 

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates.  These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.  These instruments involve elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.  The contractual amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of the Company’s involvement in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit written is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments.  The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.  Unless noted otherwise, the Company does not require collateral or other security to support off-balance sheet financial instruments with credit risk.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers as long as there are no violations of any conditions established in the contracts.  Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.  Because many of the commitments may expire without being completely drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of customers to third parties.  The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers.

 

UMG, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, uses rate lock commitments and best efforts contract during the origination process and for loans held for sale.  These best efforts contracts are designed to mitigate UMG’s exposure to fluctuations in interest rates in connection with rate lock commitments and loans held for sale.  The Company held approximately $2.6 million and $2.0 million in loans available for sale in which the related rate lock commitment had expired as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the reserves associated with these loans held for sale were $104,000 and $94,000, respectively, and are reflected on the balance sheet of the mortgage segment.  

 

The following table presents the balances of commitments and contingencies (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

Commitments with off-balance sheet risk:

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments to extend credit (1)

$

1,601,287 

 

$

891,680 

Standby letters of credit

 

117,988 

 

 

48,107 

Mortgage loan rate lock commitments

 

49,552 

 

 

54,834 

Total commitments with off-balance sheet risk

$

1,768,827 

 

$

994,621 

Commitments with balance sheet risk:

 

 

 

 

 

Loans held for sale

$

42,519 

 

$

53,185 

Total other commitments

$

1,811,346 

 

$

1,047,806 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Includes unfunded overdraft protection.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Company must maintain a reserve against its deposits in accordance with Regulation D of the Federal Reserve Act.  For the final weekly reporting period in the periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the aggregate amount of daily average required reserves was approximately $48.7 million and $16.0 million, respectively.

The Company has approximately $13.2 million in deposits in other financial institutions, of which $5.7 million serves as collateral for the trust swap further discussed in Note 10 “Derivatives.”  The Company had approximately $6.5 million in deposits in other financial institutions that were uninsured at December 31, 2014.  On an annual basis, the Company’s management evaluates the loss risk of its uninsured deposits in financial counter-parties.

 

For asset/liability management purposes, the Company uses interest rate swap agreements to hedge various exposures or to modify the interest rate characteristics of various balance sheet accounts.  See Note 10 “Derivatives” for additional information.

 

In the ordinary course of business, the Company records an indemnification reserve relating to mortgage loans previously sold based on historical statistics and loss rates; as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s indemnification reserve was $662,000 and $627,000, respectively and is included as a component of “Other Liabilities” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.