Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2005

Commission File No. 0-20293

UNION BANKSHARES CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

212 North Main Street

P.O. Box 446

Bowling Green, Virginia 22427

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(804) 633-5031

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  x    NO  ¨

As of April 29, 2005, Union Bankshares Corporation had 8,755,269 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

UNION BANKSHARES CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

March 31, 2005

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

UNION BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands, except share information)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

UNION BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

UNION BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005 AND 2004

(dollars in thousands)

5

Table of Contents

UNION BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

(dollars in thousands)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

UNION BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

March 31, 2005

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Union Bankshares Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”). Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The information contained in the financial statements is unaudited and does not include all of the information and footnotes required by auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) for complete financial statements. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods presented have been made. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. If needed, certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

On May 1, 2004, Union Bankshares completed its acquisition of Guaranty Financial Corporation (“Guaranty”) headquartered in Charlottesville, Virginia. This acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The total consideration paid to Guaranty stockholders in connection with the acquisition was approximately $54.9 million with approximately $23.2 million in cash and 1,023,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Guaranty transactions have been included in the financial results since May 1, 2004. Included in the acquisition on May 1, 2004 were $248 million in assets, including $165 million in loans and $184 million in deposits. As part of the purchase price allocation at May 1, 2004, the Company recorded $5.8 million in core deposit intangible, and goodwill totaled approximately $30.1 million.

The shareholders approved at the 2003 Annual Meeting the adoption of the Union Bankshares Corporation 2003 Incentive Stock Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan authorizes the issuance of 350,000 shares of common stock to be used in the awarding of incentive stock-based compensation to employees by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The Plan replaced a similar plan adopted by the shareholders in 1993 which terminated under its provisions in 2003. Options awarded under the previous plan are still exercisable, in some instances as late as 2013. Under both Plans, the option price cannot be less than the fair market value of the stock on the date granted. An option’s maximum term is ten years from the date of grant. Options granted under the Plan may be subject to a graded vesting schedule.

The Company accounts for the Plan under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principals Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock-based compensation cost is reflected in net income, relating to options awarded under this plan, as all options granted under the Plan have an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

7

Table of Contents

During the first quarter of 2005, the Company granted 5,804 performance stock grants and 5,804 restricted stock grants to certain members of senior management pursuant to the 2003 Plan. Compensation expense for performance stock and restricted stock grants is estimated and accrued over a four and five year service period, respectively. This compensation expense is based on the market price of Union Bankshares stock on the date of the grant and amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

For the three months ending March 31, 2005, under APB Opinion No. 25, the Company recorded $16 thousand related to stock-based compensation. There were no stock grants or associated expense prior to 2005. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based compensation.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

8

Table of Contents

The following summarizes activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding attributable to stock options. At March 31, 2005 and 2004 there were 63,550 and 52,300 options that were anti-dilutive, respectively. The following is a reconcilement of the denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.

During the first quarter of 2004, Union Bankshares Corporation Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was formed for the purpose of issuing redeemable capital securities. On March 18, 2004, $22.5 million of Trust Preferred Capital Notes were issued through a pooled underwriting totaling approximately $858.8 million. The securities have a LIBOR-indexed floating rate of interest (three-month LIBOR plus 2.75%) which adjusts, and is payable, quarterly. The interest rate at March 31, 2005 was 5.78%. The securities may be redeemed at par beginning on June 17, 2009 and each quarterly anniversary of such date until the securities mature on June 17, 2034. The principal asset of the Trust is $22.5 million of the Union Bankshares Corporation’s junior subordinated debt securities with like maturities and like interest rates to the capital securities.

The Trust Preferred Capital Notes may be included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital adequacy determination purposes up to 25% of Tier I capital after its inclusion. The portion of the Trust Preferred not considered as Tier I capital may be included in Tier II capital.

The obligations of the Company with respect to the issuance of the Capital Securities constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the Trust’s obligations with respect to the capital securities.

9

Table of Contents

Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, the Company may elect from time to time to defer interest payments on the junior subordinated debt securities, which would result in a deferral of distribution payments on the related capital securities and require a deferral of common dividends.

Union Bankshares Corporation has two reportable segments: traditional full service community banking and mortgage loan origination. The community bank segment includes four banks which provide loan, deposit and investment services to retail and commercial customers throughout their locations in Virginia. The mortgage segment provides a variety of mortgage loan products principally in Virginia and Maryland. These loans are originated and sold primarily in the secondary market through purchase commitments from investors, which subject the Company to only de minimis risk.

Profit and loss is measured by net income after taxes including realized gains and losses on the Company’s investment portfolio. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies of the Company. Intersegment transactions are recorded at cost and eliminated as part of the consolidation process.

Both of the Company’s reportable segments are service-based. The mortgage business is a fee-based business, while the banks are driven principally by net interest income. The banks provide a distribution and referral network through their customers for the mortgage loan origination business. The mortgage segment offers a more limited network for the banks, due largely to the minimal degree of overlapping geographic markets.

The community bank segment provides the mortgage segment with the short-term funds needed to originate mortgage loans through a warehouse line of credit and charges interest to the mortgage banking segment. These transactions are eliminated in the consolidation process. A management fee for support services (including data processing, item processing, accounting, human resources and other services) is charged to all subsidiaries at cost and eliminated in the consolidation totals.

10

Table of Contents

Information about reportable segments and reconciliation of such information to the consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 follows:

Union Bankshares Corporation

Segment Report

On June 29, 2004, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to buy up to 150,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock in the open market at prices that management and the Board of Directors determine to be prudent. This authorization expires May 31, 2005. Renewal for an additional year will take place during the second quarter. The Company considers current market conditions and the Company’s current capital level, in addition to other factors, when deciding whether to repurchase stock. It is anticipated that any repurchased shares will be used primarily for general corporate purposes, including the dividend reinvestment plan, incentive stock option plan and other employee benefit plans. No shares have been purchased under this authorization to date.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) No. 123(R) – Share-Based Payment, which replaces FAS No. 123 – Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25 – Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 – Share-Based Payment, which provides interpretive guidance related to FAS No. 123(R). FAS 123(R) eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic method and requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method and recognized as expense in the condensed consolidated statement of income. With limited exceptions, the amount of compensation cost is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. FAS No. 123(R) requires liability awards to be remeasured each reporting period

11

Table of Contents

and compensation costs to be recognized over the period that an employee provides service in exchange for the award. In April 2005, the SEC delayed the effective date of FAS No. 123(R) to the beginning of the annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. Management is currently evaluating the effect that adoption of this statement will have on the Company’s financial position and results of operation. The Company currently measures compensation costs related to share-based payments under APB Opinion No. 25, as allowed by FAS No. 123, and provides disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements as required under FAS No. 123.

Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments (“EITF 03-1”) was issued and is effective March 31, 2004. EITF 03-1 provides guidance for determining the meaning of “other-than-temporarily impaired” and its application to certain debt and equity securities within the scope of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (“SFAS No. 115”) and investments accounted for under the cost method. The guidance requires that investments which have declined in value due to credit concerns or solely due to changes in interest rates must be recorded as other-than-temporarily impaired unless the Company can assert and demonstrate its intention to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery of fair value up to or beyond the cost of the investment which might mean maturity. This issue also requires disclosures assessing the ability and intent to hold investments in instances in which an investor determines that an investment with a fair value less than cost is not other-than-temporarily impaired. On September 30, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board decided to delay the effective date for the measurement and recognition guidance contained in EITF 03-1. This delay does not suspend the requirement to recognize other-than-temporary impairments as required by existing authoritative literature. The disclosure guidance in EITF 03-1 was not delayed.

Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which prescribes the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to initial recognition. The provisions of SFAS No. 142 discontinue the amortization of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives but require at least an annual impairment review, and more frequently if certain impairment indicators are in evidence. Accumulated amortization shown below for goodwill is for amounts amortized prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142. Based on the testing for impairment of goodwill and intangible assets, there were no impairment charges for 2004, 2003 or 2002. Core deposit intangible assets are being amortized over the period of expected benefit, which ranges from 8 to 15 years. As part of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition of Guaranty, the Company recorded approximately $5.8 million in core deposit intangible assets and $30.1 million in goodwill. The core deposit intangible assets recorded in the Guaranty acquisition are being amortized over an average of 8.74 years. Information concerning goodwill and intangible assets is presented in the following table:

12

Table of Contents

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being completely drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. At March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company had outstanding loan commitments approximating $507.8 million and $345.0 million, respectively.

Letters of credit written are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The amount of standby letters of credit whose contract amounts represent credit risk totaled approximately $25.7 million and $15.2 million at March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

At March 31, 2005, the mortgage company had rate lock commitments to originate mortgage loans amounting to approximately $21.8 million and loans held for sale of $37.4 million. The mortgage company has entered into corresponding mandatory commitments, on a best-efforts basis, to sell loans servicing released totaling approximately $59.2 million. These commitments to sell loans are designed to eliminate the mortgage company’s exposure to fluctuations in interest rates in connection with rate lock commitments and loans held for sale.

13

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

Union Bankshares Corporation

Bowling Green, Virginia

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Union Bankshares Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2005 and the related condensed consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. These condensed financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the consolidated balance sheet of Union Bankshares Corporation as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 18, 2005, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/ Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C.

Winchester, Virginia

May 6, 2005

14

Table of Contents

ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s discussion and analysis is presented to aid the reader in understanding and evaluating the financial condition and results of operations of Union Bankshares Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”). This discussion and analysis should be read with the consolidated financial statements, the footnotes thereto, and the other financial data included in this report, as well as the Annual Report of UBSH on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. Highlighted in the discussion are material changes from prior reporting periods and any identifiable trends affecting the Company. Results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be attained for any other period. Amounts are rounded for presentation purposes, while the percentages presented are computed based on unrounded amounts.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this report may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements that include projections, predictions, expectations or beliefs about future events or results or otherwise are not statements of historical fact. Such statements are often characterized by the use of qualified words (and their derivatives) such as “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” or other statements concerning opinions or judgment of the Company and its management about future events. Although the Company believes that its expectations with respect to certain forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions within the bounds of its existing knowledge of its business and operations, there can be no assurance that actual results, performance or achievements of the Company will not differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Actual future results and trends may differ materially from historical results or those anticipated depending on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the effects of and changes in: general economic conditions, the interest rate environment, legislative and regulatory requirements, competitive pressures, new products and delivery systems, inflation, changes in the stock and bond markets, technology, and consumer spending and savings habits. The Company does not update any forward-looking statements that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting and reporting policies of Union Bankshares Corporation and its subsidiaries are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and conform to general practices within the banking industry. The Company’s financial position and results of operations are affected by management’s application of accounting policies, including estimates, assumptions and judgments made to arrive at the carrying value of assets and liabilities and amounts reported for revenues, expenses and related disclosures. Different assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes in the Company’s consolidated financial position and/or results of operations.

The more critical accounting and reporting policies include accounting for the allowance for loan losses, business combinations and income taxes. The Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding the Company’s consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations. Accordingly, the Company’s significant accounting policies are discussed in detail in Note 1 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in the Company’s Annual Report of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

The following is a summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies that are highly dependent on estimates, assumptions and judgments.

15

Table of Contents

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of the losses that may be sustained in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic principles of accounting: (i) Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimatable and (ii) SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, which requires that losses be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral – present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market – and the loan balance.

The Company’s allowance for loan losses is the accumulation of various components that are calculated based on independent methodologies. All components of the allowance represent an estimation performed pursuant to either SFAS No. 5 or SFAS No. 114. Management’s estimate of each SFAS No. 5 component is based on certain observable data that management believes are most reflective of the underlying credit losses being estimated. This evaluation includes credit quality trends; collateral values; loan volumes; geographic, borrower and industry concentrations; seasoning of the loan portfolio; the findings of internal credit quality assessments and results from external bank regulatory examinations. These factors, as well as historical losses and current economic and business conditions, are used in developing estimated loss factors used in the calculations.

Reserves for commercial loans are determined by applying estimated loss factors to the portfolio based on management’s evaluation and “risk grading” of the commercial loan portfolio. Reserves are provided for noncommercial loan categories using estimated loss factors applied to the total outstanding loan balance of each loan category. Specific reserves are typically provided on all impaired commercial loans. The specific reserves are determined on a loan-by-loan basis based on management’s evaluation of the Company’s exposure for each credit, given the current payment status of the loan and the value of any underlying collateral.

While management uses the best information available to establish the allowance for loan and lease losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if economic or other conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the valuations or, if required by regulators, based upon information available to them at the time of their examinations. Such adjustments to original estimates, as necessary, are made in the period in which these factors and other relevant considerations indicate that loss levels may vary from previous estimates.

Business Combinations

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, Business Combinations, requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. For purchase acquisitions, the Company is required to record assets acquired, including identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities assumed at their fair value, which in many instances involves estimates based on third party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analysis or other valuation techniques. Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which prescribes the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to initial recognition. The provisions of SFAS No. 142 discontinue the amortization of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives but require at least an annual impairment review and more frequently if certain impairment indicators are in evidence. The Company adopted SFAS 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions, on January 1, 2002 and determined that core deposit intangibles will continue to be amortized over their estimated useful life.

16

Table of Contents

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes is based upon the results of operations, adjusted for the effect of certain tax-exempt income and non-deductible expenses. In addition, certain items of income and expense are reported in different periods for financial reporting and tax return purposes. The tax effects of these temporary differences are recognized currently in the deferred income tax provision or benefit. Deferred tax assets or liabilities are computed based on the difference between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using the applicable enacted marginal tax rate.

The Company must also evaluate the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. If any such assets are not likely to be recovered, a valuation allowance must be recognized. The Company has determined that a valuation allowance is not required for deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2005. The assessment of the carrying value of deferred tax assets is based on certain assumptions, changes in which could have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Overview

The Company is a multi-bank holding company which uses a super-community bank strategy to serve small and middle market business and retail consumers throughout the high-growth Central Virginia region. The Company offers a broad range of financial services through 44 branches of its four community banks and through its investment and mortgage companies. The four banks are well established with a long history of serving their communities: Union Bank & Trust Company (founded in 1902), Rappahannock National Bank (1902), Northern Neck State Bank (1907), and the Bank of Williamsburg (1999). Union Investment Services (1993) operates out of four locations and Mortgage Capital Investors (1986) serves customers through nine mortgage company locations in Virginia, Maryland and South Carolina. Virtually all non-retail, or backoffice, operations are consolidated within the holding company to create economies of scale, achieve efficiencies and allow the financial service subsidiaries to focus on customer service and delivery. At March 31, 2005, the Company had $1.7 billion in total assets.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the Company’s net income was $5.45 million, a 51.1% increase over the same quarter a year earlier. Contributing to this expansion, year over year, is the additional earnings from the acquisition of Guaranty Financial Corporation (“Guaranty”), which is excluded from first quarter 2004 figures. Since the third quarter of 2004 net income has increased approximately $1 million. This represents earnings growth in each successive quarter, on a diluted earnings per share basis, of $.51, $.60 and $.62, respectively. Moreover, quarterly margin expansion, to 4.41% from 4.14% (FTE) in the third quarter 2004, has been fueled by increasing Fed tightening since the beginning of the third quarter 2004 on an expanding base of earning assets. This growth in the margin of 9 basis points from the third to the fourth quarter 2004 and 18 basis points from the fourth quarter 2004 to the first quarter 2005 is a function of earning asset volumes and yields outpacing the same in cost of funds. Coupled with disciplined asset/liability management practice, this favorably impacts pricing and allows the Company to remain competitive in all of its markets.

Results of Operations

Net Income

Net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 was $5.45 million, up 51.1% from $3.61 million for the same period in 2004. Earnings per share on a diluted basis increased 31.9 %, from $.47 to $.62 for the quarter. Annualized return on average equity for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 was 13.36%, while annualized return on average assets for the same period was 1.32%, compared to 11.95% and 1.16% respectively, for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. Results for the first quarter of 2004 do not reflect the May 1, 2004 acquisition of Guaranty, although earnings per share figures for the first quarter of 2005 include income from the former Guaranty operations as well as the shares issued in the acquisition. On a linked quarter basis (current quarter to most recent prior quarter), net income increased 3.0% from $5.29 million in the fourth quarter of 2004 to $5.45 million in the first quarter of 2005. The Company’s annualized return on average equity and on average assets increased to 13.36% and 1.32% from 13.13% and 1.27%, respectively, from the fourth quarter of 2004.

17

Table of Contents

Non-GAAP Measures

As noted earlier in this report, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, Business Combinations, requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. Prior to the issuance of SFAS No. 141, the Company accounted for most of its acquisition activity using the pooling method of accounting. The recent acquisition of Guaranty Financial Corporation is the Company’s most significant business combination to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. At March 31, 2005, core deposit intangibles totaled $9.4 million, up from $4.8 million a year earlier and goodwill totaled $31.3 million, up from $864 thousand at March 31, 2004. Amortization of core deposit intangibles has increased during 2005 as a result of the core deposit intangibles recorded in the Guaranty transaction.

In reporting its result, the Company has provided supplemental performance measures on an operating or tangible basis. Such measures exclude amortization expense related to intangible assets, such as core deposit intangibles. The Company believes these measures are useful to investors as they exclude non-operating adjustments resulting from acquisition activity and allow investors to see the combined economic results of the organization. Cash basis operating earnings per share was $.64 per share for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as compared to $.48 per share a year earlier, an increase of 33.3%. Cash basis return on tangible equity for the first quarter of 2005 was 18.34% as compared to 12.87% a year earlier, and cash basis return on average tangible assets was 1.40% as compared to 1.20% a year earlier.

These measures are a supplement to GAAP used to prepare the Company’s financial statements and should not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP measures. In addition, the Company’s non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to non-GAAP measures of other companies. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures from their respective GAAP basis measures can be found below.

18

Table of Contents