UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
Commission file number: 0-20293
UNION BANKSHARES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
VIRGINIA |
54-1598552 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employee Identification No.) |
212 North Main Street, P.O. Box 446, Bowling Green, Virginia 22427
(Address or principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(804) 633-5031
(Registrants telephone number including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $2 par value
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b 2 of the Act). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of February 21, 2003 was $174,363,576.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 21, 2003 was 7,589,524.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement to be used in conjunction with the registrants 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated into Part III of this Form 10-K.
FORM 10-K
INDEX
Page | ||||
PART I | ||||
Item 1. |
1 | |||
Item 2. |
7 | |||
Item 3. |
8 | |||
Item 4. |
8 | |||
PART II | ||||
Item 5. |
Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters |
9 | ||
Item 6. |
10 | |||
Item 7. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
11 | ||
Item 7A. |
28 | |||
Item 8. |
29 | |||
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
55 | ||
PART III | ||||
Item 10. |
56 | |||
Item 11. |
56 | |||
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
56 | ||
Item 13. |
57 | |||
Item 14. |
57 | |||
PART IV | ||||
Item 15. |
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K |
58 |
i
PART I
GENERAL
Union Bankshares Corporation (the Company) is a multi-bank holding company organized under Virginia law and registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. The Company is headquartered in Bowling Green, Virginia. The Company is committed to the delivery of financial services through its four affiliated community banks (the Community Banks) and two non-bank financial services affiliates:
Community Banks |
||
Union Bank & Trust Company |
Bowling Green, Virginia | |
Northern Neck State Bank |
Warsaw, Virginia | |
Rappahannock National Bank |
Washington, Virginia | |
Bank of Williamsburg |
Williamsburg, Virginia | |
Financial Services Affiliates |
||
Mortgage Capital Investors, Inc. |
Springfield, Virginia | |
Union Investment Services, Inc. |
Bowling Green, Virginia |
The Company was formed in connection with the July 1993 merger of Northern Neck Bankshares Corporation and Union Bancorp, Inc. into Union Bankshares Corporation. On September 1, 1996, King George State Bank and on July 1, 1998, Rappahannock National Bank became wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. On February 22, 1999, the Bank of Williamsburg began business as a newly organized bank. In June 1999, after the retirement of its president, King George State Bank was merged into Union Bank & Trust Company (Union Bank) and ceased to be a subsidiary bank.
Each of the Community Banks is a full service retail commercial bank offering consumers and businesses a wide range of banking and related financial services, including checking, savings, certificates of deposit and other depository services, and loans for commercial, industrial, residential mortgage and consumer purposes. The Community Banks also issue credit cards and can deliver automated teller machine services through the use of reciprocally shared ATMs in the major ATM networks. All of the Community Banks offer Internet banking access for banking services and online bill payment for both consumers and commercial companies.
The Company principally serves, through its Community Banks, the Virginia counties of Caroline, Hanover, James City, King George, King William, Spotsylvania, Stafford, Richmond, Westmoreland, Essex, Lancaster and Northumberland, and the Cities of Williamsburg, Newport News and Fredericksburg, Virginia. In January 2002, the Bank of Williamsburg opened a loan production office servicing Newport News and converted it to a full service branch in May 2002. In August 2002, Union Bank opened a loan production office in the Manassas area (Prince William County) and anticipates opening a loan production office in the Greater Richmond market (Western Henrico County) in early 2003. Through its Community Banks, the Company operated 31 branches in its primary trade area at December 31, 2002.
Union Investment Services has provided securities, brokerage and investment advisory services since its formation in February 1993. It is a full service investment company handling all aspects of wealth management including stocks, bonds, annuities, mutual funds and financial planning.
On February 11, 1999, the Company acquired CMK Corporation t/a Mortgage Capital Investors, a mortgage loan brokerage company headquartered in Springfield, Virginia, by merger of CMK
Corporation into Mortgage Capital Investors, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Union Bank (MCI). MCI has seven offices located in Virginia (3), Maryland (3) and South Carolina (1), and is also licensed to do business in Washington, D.C. MCI provides a variety of mortgage products to customers in those states. The mortgage loans originated by MCI are generally sold in the secondary market through purchase agreements with institutional investors. MCI also offers insurance services to its customers through a joint venture with an insurance agency.
Union Bankshares Corporation had assets of $1.116 billion, deposits of $897.6 million and stockholders equity of $105.5 million at December 31, 2002. The Community Banks range in asset size from $40.9 to $766.7 million at December 31, 2002.
SEGMENTS
The Company has two reportable segments: traditional full service community banks and a mortgage loan origination business, each as described above. See Note 17 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8, Financial Statement and Supplementary Data, of this Form 10-K and Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of this Form 10-K, for certain financial and other information about each of the Companys operating segments.
ACQUISITION PROGRAM
The Company looks to expand its market area and increase its market share through internal growth, de novo expansion and strategic acquisitions. In 2002, the Company, through two of its Community Banks, opened two loan production offices as a means to enter new markets in Virginia: Newport News and Manassas. The Newport News location received regulatory approval in May 2002 to become a full service branch.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2003 the Company had 471 employees, including executive officers, loan and other banking officers, branch personnel, operations personnel and others. None of the Companys employees is represented by a union or covered under a collective bargaining agreement. Management of the Company considers their employee relations to be excellent.
COMPETITION
The Company experiences strong competition in all aspects of its business. In its market area, the Company competes with large national and regional financial institutions, savings and loans and other independent community banks, as well as credit unions, consumer finance companies, mortgage companies, loan productions offices, mutual funds and life insurance companies. Competition has increasingly come from out-of-state banks through their acquisitions of Virginia-based banks. Competition for deposits and loans is affected by factors such as interest rates offered, the number and location of branches and types of products offered, as well as the reputation of the institution. The Companys non-bank financial services affiliates also operate in highly competitive environments.
Union Bankshares Corporation is the second largest independent bank holding company headquartered in Virginia, after the announced acquisition of First Virginia Bank by BB&T Corp. The Companys Community Banks generally have a strong market share within the markets they serve, but due to the significant presence of out of state banks and the Companys absence in many Virginia markets, the Companys deposit market share in Virginia is only .69% of the total banking deposits in Virginia.
2
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
Bank holding companies and banks are extensively regulated under both federal and state law. The following description briefly addresses certain provisions of federal and state laws and certain regulations and proposed regulations and the potential impact of such provisions on the Company and the Community Banks. To the extent statutory or regulatory provisions or proposals are described herein, the description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory or regulatory provisions or proposals.
Bank Holding Companies
As a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the BHCA), the Company is subject to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve Board). The Federal Reserve Board has jurisdiction under the BHCA to approve any bank or non-bank acquisition, merger or consolidation proposed by a bank holding company. The BHCA generally limits the activities of a bank holding company and its subsidiaries to that of banking, managing or controlling banks, or any other activity that is so closely related to banking or to managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto.
Since September 1995, the BHCA has permitted bank holding companies from any state to acquire banks and bank holding companies located in any other state, subject to certain conditions, including nationwide and state imposed concentration limits. Banks are also able to branch across state lines, provided certain conditions are met, including that applicable state law must expressly permit such interstate branching. Virginia has adopted legislation that permits branching across state lines, provided there is reciprocity with the state in which the out-of-state bank is based.
There are a number of obligations and restrictions imposed on bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries by federal law and regulatory policy that are designed to reduce potential loss exposure to the depositors of such depository institutions and to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) insurance funds in the event the depository institution becomes in danger of default or is in default. For example, under a policy of the Federal Reserve Board with respect to bank holding company operations, a bank holding company is required to serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary depository institutions and to commit resources to support such institutions in circumstances where it might not do so absent such policy. In addition, the cross-guarantee provisions of federal law require insured depository institutions under common control to reimburse the FDIC for any loss suffered or reasonably anticipated by either the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) or the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) as a result of the default of a commonly controlled insured depository institution in danger of default. The FDIC may decline to enforce the cross-guarantee provisions if it determines that a waiver is in the best interest of the SAIF or the BIF or both. The FDICs claim for damages is superior to claims of stockholders of the insured depository institution or its holding company but is subordinate to claims of depositors, secured creditors and holders of subordinated debt (other than affiliates) of the commonly controlled insured depository institutions.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the FDIA) also provides that amounts received from the liquidation or other resolution of any insured depository institution by any receiver must be distributed (after payment of secured claims) to pay the deposit liabilities of the institution prior to payment of any other general creditor or stockholder. This provision would give depositors a preference over general and subordinated creditors and stockholders in the event a receiver is appointed to distribute the assets of the bank.
The Company is registered under the bank holding company laws of Virginia. Accordingly, the Company and the Community Banks (other than Rappahannock National Bank, which is federally regulated) are subject to regulation and supervision by the State Corporation Commission of Virginia (the SCC).
3
Capital Requirements
The Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the OCC) and the FDIC have issued substantially similar risk-based and leverage capital guidelines applicable to United States banking organizations. In addition, those regulatory agencies may from time to time require that a banking organization maintain capital above the minimum levels because of its financial condition or actual or anticipated growth. Under the risk-based capital requirements of these federal bank regulatory agencies, the Company and each of the Subsidiary Banks are required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8%. At least half of the total capital is required to be Tier 1 capital, which consists principally of common and certain qualifying preferred shareholders equity, less certain intangibles and other adjustments. The remainder (Tier 2 capital) consists of a limited amount of subordinated and other qualifying debt (including certain hybrid capital instruments) and a limited amount of the general loan loss allowance. The Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted asset ratios of the Company as of December 31, 2002 were 11.05% and 12.15%, respectively, exceeding the minimum requirements.
In addition, each of the federal regulatory agencies has established a minimum leverage capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to average tangible assets) (Tier 1 leverage ratio). These guidelines provide for a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% for banks and bank holding companies that meet certain specified criteria, including that they have the highest regulatory examination rating and are not contemplating significant growth or expansion. The Tier 1 leverage ratio of the Company as of December 31, 2002, was 8.49%, which is above the minimum requirements. The guidelines also provide that banking organizations experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels, without significant reliance on intangible assets.
Limits on Dividends and Other Payments
The Company is a legal entity, separate and distinct from its subsidiary institutions. A significant portion of the revenues of the Company result from dividends paid to it by the Community Banks. There are various legal limitations applicable to the payment of dividends by the Community Banks to the Company, as well as the payment of dividends by the Company to its respective shareholders.
Under federal law, the Community Banks may not, subject to certain limited exceptions, make loans or extensions of credit to, or investments in the securities of, the Company or take securities of the Company as collateral for loans to any borrower. The Community Banks are also subject to collateral security requirements for any loans or extensions of credit permitted by such exceptions.
The Community Banks are subject to various statutory restrictions on their ability to pay dividends to the Company. Under the current supervisory practices of the Community Banks regulatory agencies, prior approval from those agencies is required if cash dividends declared in any given year exceed net income for that year plus retained net profits of the two preceding years. The payment of dividends by the Community Banks or the Company may also be limited by other factors, such as requirements to maintain capital above regulatory guidelines. Bank regulatory agencies have the authority to prohibit the Community Banks or the Company from engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice in conducting their business. The payment of dividends, depending on the financial condition of the Community Banks, or the Company, could be deemed to constitute such an unsafe or unsound practice.
Under the FDIA, insured depository institutions such as the Community Banks are prohibited from making capital distributions, including the payment of dividends, if, after making such distribution,
4
the institution would become undercapitalized (as such term is used in the statute). Based on the Community Banks current financial condition, the Company does not expect that this provision will have any impact on its ability to obtain dividends from the Community Banks.
In addition to dividends it receives from the Community Banks, the Company receives management fees from its affiliated companies for various services provided to them including: data processing, item processing, customer accounting, financial accounting, human resources, funds management, credit administration, sales and marketing, collections, facilities management, call center and internal audit. These fees are charged to each subsidiary based upon various specific allocation methods measuring the usage of such services by that subsidiary. The fees are eliminated in the consolidation process.
The Community Banks
The Community Banks are supervised and regularly examined by the Federal Reserve Board and the SCC, and in the case of Rappahannock National Bank, the OCC. The various laws and regulations administered by the regulatory agencies affect corporate practices, such as the payment of dividends, incurring debt and acquisition of financial institutions and other companies, and affect business practices, such as the payment of interest on deposits, the charging of interest on loans, types of business conducted and location of offices.
The Community Banks are also subject to the requirements of the Community Reinvestment Act (the CRA). The CRA imposes on financial institutions an affirmative and ongoing obligation to meet the credit needs of the local communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound operation of those institutions. Each financial institutions efforts in meeting community credit needs currently are evaluated as part of the examination process pursuant to twelve assessment factors. These factors also are considered in evaluating mergers, acquisitions and applications to open a branch or facility.
As institutions with deposits insured by the BIF, the Community Banks also are subject to insurance assessments imposed by the FDIC. There is a base assessment for all institutions. In addition, the FDIC has implemented a risk-based assessment schedule, imposing assessments ranging from zero to 0.27% of an institutions average assessment base. The actual assessment to be paid by each BIF member is based on the institutions assessment risk classification, which is determined based on whether the institution is considered well capitalized, adequately capitalized or undercapitalized, as such terms have been defined in applicable federal regulations, and whether such institution is considered by its supervisory agency to be financially sound or to have supervisory concerns. In 2002, the Company paid only the base assessment rate through the Community Banks which amounted to $134,713 in deposit insurance premiums.
Other Safety and Soundness Regulations
The federal banking agencies have broad powers under current federal law to make prompt corrective action to resolve problems of insured depository institutions. The extent of these powers depends upon whether the institutions in question are well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized. All such terms are defined under uniform regulations defining such capital levels issued by each of the federal banking agencies.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA) was signed into law on November 12, 1999. The main purpose of GLBA is to permit greater affiliations within the financial services industry, primarily
5
banking, securities and insurance. The provisions of GLBA that are believed to be of most significance to the Company are discussed below.
GLBA repealed sections 20 and 32 of the Glass-Steagall Act, which separated commercial banking from investment banking, and substantially amends the BHCA, which limited the ability of bank holding companies to engage in the securities and insurance businesses. To achieve this purpose, GLBA created a new type of company, the financial holding company. A financial holding company may engage in or acquire companies that engage in a broad range of financial services, including
| securities activities such as underwriting, dealing, brokerage, investment and merchant banking; and |
| insurance underwriting, sales and brokerage activities. |
A bank holding company may elect to become a financial holding company only if all of its depository institution subsidiaries are well-capitalized, well-managed and have at least a satisfactory CRA rating. For various reasons, the Company has not elected to be treated as a financial holding company.
GLBA establishes a system of functional regulation under which the federal banking agencies regulate the banking activities of financial holding companies and banks financial subsidiaries, the Securities and Exchange Commission regulate their securities activities and state insurance regulators will regulate their insurance activities.
GLBA and certain regulations issued by federal banking agencies also provide protection against the transfer and use by financial institutions of consumers nonpublic personal information. A financial institution must provide to its customers, at the beginning of the customer relationship and annually thereafter, the institutions policies and procedures regarding the handling of customers nonpublic personal financial information. The privacy provisions generally prohibit a financial institution from providing a customers personal financial information to unaffiliated third parties unless the institution discloses to the customer that the information may be so provided and the customer is given the opportunity to opt out of such disclosure.
Neither the provisions of GLBA nor the acts implementing regulations have had a material impact on the Companys or the Community Banks regulatory capital ratios (as discussed above) or ability to continue to operate in a safe and sound manner.
SEC Filings
The Company files annual, quarterly and other reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These reports are posted and are available at the Companys website, ubsh.com.
6
The Company, through its subsidiaries, owns or leases buildings that are used in the normal course of business. The main office is located at 212 N. Main Street, Bowling Green, Virginia, in a building owned by the Company. The Companys subsidiaries own or lease various other offices in the counties and cities in which they operate. See the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8, Financial Statement and Supplementary Data, of this Form 10-K for information with respect to the amounts at which bank premises and equipment are carried and commitments under long-term leases.
Unless otherwise indicated, the properties below are owned by the Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002.
Locations
Corporate Headquarters |
||
212 North Main Street |
Bowling Green, Virginia | |
Banking OfficesUnion Bank & Trust Company |
||
211 North Main Street |
Bowling Green, Virginia | |
Route 1 |
Ladysmith, Virginia | |
Route 301 |
Port Royal, Virginia | |
4540 Lafayette Boulevard |
Fredericksburg, Virginia | |
Route 1 and Ashcake Road |
Ashland, Virginia | |
4210 Plank Road |
Fredericksburg, Virginia | |
10415 Courthouse Road |
Spotsylvania, Virginia | |
9665 Sliding Hill Road |
Ashland, Virginia | |
700 Kenmore Avenue |
Fredericksburg, Virginia | |
Route 360 |
Manquin, Virginia | |
9534 Chamberlayne Road |
Mechanicsville, Virginia | |
Cambridge and Layhill Road |
Fredericksburg, Virginia (leased) | |
Massaponax Church Road and Route 1 |
Spotsylvania, Virginia (leased) | |
Brock Road and Route 3 |
Spotsylvania, Virginia (leased) | |
2811 Fall Hill Avenue |
Fredericksburg, Virginia | |
610 Mechanicsville Turnpike |
Mechanicsville, Virginia (leased) | |
10045 Kings Highway |
King George, Virginia | |
840 McKinney Blvd. |
Colonial Beach, Virginia | |
5510 Morris Road |
Thornburg, Virginia | |
Loan Production OfficesUnion Bank & Trust Company |
||
9282 Corporate Circle, Building 7 |
||
Ashton Professional Center |
Manassas, Virginia (leased) | |
Banking OfficesNorthern Neck State Bank |
||
5839 Richmond Road |
Warsaw, Virginia | |
4256 Richmond Road |
Warsaw, Virginia | |
Route 3, Kings Highway |
Montross, Virginia | |
1649 Tappahannock Blvd |
Tappahannock, Virginia | |
1660 Tappahannock Blvd (Wal-Mart) |
Tappahannock, Virginia (leased) | |
15043 Northumberland Highway |
Burgess, Virginia | |
284 North Main Street |
Kilmarnock, Virginia | |
876 Main Street |
Reedville, Virginia | |
485 Chesapeake Drive |
White Stone, Virginia |
7
Banking OfficeRappahannock National Bank |
||
257 Gay Street |
Washington, Virginia | |
Banking OfficeBank of Williamsburg |
||
5125 John Tyler Parkway |
Williamsburg, Virginia (land lease) | |
610 Thimble Shoals Boulevard |
Newport News, Virginia (leased) | |
Union Investment Services, Inc. |
||
111 Davis Court |
Bowling Green, Virginia | |
9665 Sliding Hill Road |
Ashland, Virginia | |
2811 Fall Hill Avenue |
Fredericksburg, Virginia | |
Mortgage Capital Investors, Inc. (All leased) |
||
5835 Allentown Way |
Camp Springs, Maryland | |
5440 Jeff Davis Highway, #103 |
Fredericksburg, Virginia | |
3 Hillcrest Drive #A100 |
Frederick, Maryland | |
7501 Greenway Center, #140 |
Greenbelt, Maryland | |
7901 N. Ocean Boulevard |
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina | |
6330 Newtown Road, #211 |
Norfolk, Virginia | |
6571 Edsall Road |
Springfield, Virginia |
In the ordinary course of its operations, the Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various legal proceedings. Based on the information presently available, and after consultation with legal counsel, management believes that the ultimate outcome in such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the business or the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2002.
8
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Union Bankshares Corporations common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol UBSH. The Companys common stock began trading on the Nasdaq National Market in October 1993.
There were 7,579,707 shares of the Companys common stock outstanding at the close of business on December 31, 2002, which were held by 2,255 shareholders of record. The closing price of the Companys stock on December 31, 2002 was $27.25 per share as compared to $16.24 on December 31, 2001.
The following table summarizes the high and low sales prices and dividends declared for the two years ended December 31, 2002.
Market Values |
Declared Dividends | |||||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||||||||||
High |
Low |
High |
Low |
2002 |
2001 | |||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ |
21.80 |
$ |
15.50 |
$ |
19.50 |
$ |
10.19 |
$ |
|
$ |
| ||||||
Second Quarter |
|
27.95 |
|
20.96 |
|
16.88 |
|
11.50 |
|
0.25 |
|
0.22 | ||||||
Third Quarter |
|
29.00 |
|
22.54 |
|
17.40 |
|
14.19 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Fourth Quarter |
|
29.33 |
|
22.25 |
|
17.20 |
|
15.05 |
|
0.27 |
|
0.24 | ||||||
$ |
0.52 |
$ |
0.46 | |||||||||||||||
Restrictions on the ability of the Community Banks to transfer funds to the Company at December 31, 2002, are set forth in Note 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Form 10-K. A discussion of certain limitations on the ability of the Community Banks to pay dividends to the Company and the ability of the Company to pay dividends on its common stock, is set forth in Part I, Business, of this Form 10-K under the headings Supervision and RegulationLimits on Dividends and Other Payments and The Community Banks.
The dividend amount on the Companys common stock is established by the Board of Directors semi-annually and dividends are typically paid on May 1st and November 1st of each year. In making its decision on the payment of dividends on the Companys common stock, the Board considers operating results, financial condition, capital adequacy, regulatory requirements, shareholder returns and other factors.
9
Item 6.Selected Financial Data
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the Company for the last five years.
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||||||||||
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ |
65,205 |
|
$ |
65,576 |
|
$ |
64,867 |
|
$ |
55,636 |
|
$ |
51,062 |
| |||||
Interest expense |
|
24,627 |
|
|
32,483 |
|
|
33,530 |
|
|
27,067 |
|
|
24,463 |
| |||||
Net interest income |
|
40,578 |
|
|
33,093 |
|
|
31,337 |
|
|
28,569 |
|
|
26,599 |
| |||||
Provision for loan losses |
|
2,878 |
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
2,216 |
|
|
3,044 |
| |||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
37,700 |
|
|
30,967 |
|
|
29,236 |
|
|
26,353 |
|
|
23,555 |
| |||||
Noninterest income |
|
17,538 |
|
|
16,092 |
|
|
12,011 |
|
|
13,246 |
|
|
5,567 |
| |||||
Noninterest expenses |
|
35,922 |
|
|
32,447 |
|
|
32,424 |
|
|
32,689 |
|
|
20,622 |
| |||||
Income before income taxes |
|
19,316 |
|
|
14,612 |
|
|
8,823 |
|
|
6,910 |
|
|
8,500 |
| |||||
Income tax expense |
|
4,811 |
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
636 |
|
|
1,678 |
| |||||
Net income |
$ |
14,505 |
|
$ |
11,679 |
|
$ |
7,600 |
|
$ |
6,274 |
|
$ |
6,822 |
| |||||
KEY PERFORMANCE RATIOS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets (ROA) |
|
1.41 |
% |
|
1.27 |
% |
|
0.88 |
% |
|
0.79 |
% |
|
1.00 |
% | |||||
Return on average equity (ROE) |
|
14.91 |
% |
|
13.55 |
% |
|
10.69 |
% |
|
8.74 |
% |
|
9.58 |
% | |||||
Efficiency ratio |
|
58.90 |
% |
|
62.13 |
% |
|
71.18 |
% |
|
74.50 |
% |
|
61.24 |
% | |||||
PER SHARE DATA |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income per sharebasic |
$ |
1.92 |
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
$ |
0.91 |
| |||||
Net income per sharediluted |
|
1.90 |
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
0.83 |
|
|
0.91 |
| |||||
Cash dividends declared |
|
0.52 |
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
0.38 |
| |||||
Book value at period-end |
|
13.92 |
|
|
11.82 |
|
|
10.42 |
|
|
9.19 |
|
|
9.77 |
| |||||
FINANCIAL CONDITION |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ |
1,115,725 |
|
$ |
983,097 |
|
$ |
881,961 |
|
$ |
821,827 |
|
$ |
733,947 |
| |||||
Total deposits |
|
897,642 |
|
|
784,084 |
|
|
692,472 |
|
|
646,866 |
|
|
607,629 |
| |||||
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
714,764 |
|
|
600,164 |
|
|
580,790 |
|
|
543,367 |
|
|
479,822 |
| |||||
Stockholders equity |
|
105,492 |
|
|
88,979 |
|
|
78,352 |
|
|
68,794 |
|
|
73,359 |
| |||||
ASSET QUALITY |
||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
$ |
9,179 |
|
$ |
7,336 |
|
$ |
7,389 |
|
$ |
6,617 |
|
$ |
6,407 |
| |||||
Allowance as % of total loans |
|
1.28 |
% |
|
1.22 |
% |
|
1.27 |
% |
|
1.22 |
% |
|
1.33 |
% | |||||
OTHER DATA |
||||||||||||||||||||
Market value per share at period-end |
$ |
27.25 |
|
$ |
16.24 |
|
$ |
10.25 |
|
$ |
14.75 |
|
$ |
17.50 |
| |||||
Price to earnings ratio |
|
14.3 |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
19.2 |
| |||||
Price to book value ratio |
|
196 |
% |
|
137 |
% |
|
98 |
% |
|
161 |
% |
|
179 |
% | |||||
Equity to assets |
|
9.5 |
% |
|
9.1 |
% |
|
8.9 |
% |
|
8.4 |
% |
|
10.0 |
% | |||||
Dividend payout ratio |
|
27.08 |
% |
|
29.68 |
% |
|
39.60 |
% |
|
42.62 |
% |
|
41.76 |
% | |||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic |
|
7,555,906 |
|
|
7,523,566 |
|
|
7,508,238 |
|
|
7,473,869 |
|
|
7,489,873 |
| |||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted |
|
7,623,169 |
|
|
7,541,572 |
|
|
7,513,000 |
|
|
7,498,000 |
|
|
7,516,000 |
|
10
Item 7.Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion provides information about the major components of the results of operations and financial condition, liquidity and capital resources of Union Bankshares Corporation and its subsidiaries. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Form 10-K.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
The Companys financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). The financial information contained within the statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. The Company uses historical loss factors as one factor in determining the inherent loss that may be present in its loan portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from the historical factors that are used. The fair value of the investment portfolio is based on period end valuations but changes daily with the market. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another method. Although the economics of these transactions would be the same, the timing of events that would impact these transactions could change.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of the losses that may be sustained in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic principles of accounting: (i) Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimatable and (ii) SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, which requires that losses be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market and the loan balance.
The Companys allowance for loan losses model has three basic components: the formula allowance, the specific allowance and a calculation for unfunded loans. Each of these components is determined based upon estimates that can and do change when actual events occur. These estimates are reevaluated at least quarterly as part of a review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan loss. The allowance formula uses historical losses and current economic and business conditions in developing estimated loss factors as an indicator of future losses for various loan classifications; as a result, the estimated losses could differ from the losses incurred in the future. The specific allowance uses various techniques such as historical loss information, expected cash flows and fair market value of collateral to arrive at an estimate of losses. The use of these values is inherently subjective and actual losses could be greater or less than the estimates. The allowance calculation for unfunded loans uses historical factors to determine the losses that are attributable to these loans. Management periodically reassesses the approach taken in these estimates in order to enhance the process.
Goodwill and Intangibles
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 141, Business Combinations and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business
11
combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. Additionally, it further clarifies the criteria for the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets separate from goodwill. SFAS No. 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and prescribes the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to initial recognition. The provisions of SFAS No. 142 discontinue the amortization of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives. Instead, these assets will be subject to at least an annual impairment review, and more frequently if certain impairment indicators are in evidence. SFAS No. 142 also requires that reporting units be identified for the purpose of assessing potential future impairments of goodwill.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002. Goodwill is included in other assets and totaled $864,000 at December 31, 2002 and 2001. The goodwill is no longer amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually. Based on the testing, there were no impairment charges for 2002. Application of the nonamortization provisions of the Statement resulted in additional net income of $82,500 for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Core deposit intangibles are included in other assets and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the period of expected benefit, which ranges from 10 to 15 years. Core deposits, net of amortization amounted to $5,500,000 and $6,093,000 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Company adopted SFAS 147 on January 1, 2002 and determined that the core deposit intangible will continue to be amortized over the estimated useful life.
OVERVIEW
Union Bankshares Corporations net income for 2002 totaled $14.5 million or $1.92 per share on a basic and $1.90 on a diluted basis, up 24.2% from $11.7 million or $1.55 per share on a basic and diluted basis for 2001. Profitability as measured by return on average assets (ROA) for 2002 was 1.41% as compared to 1.27% a year earlier, while return on average equity (ROE) for 2002 was 14.91% as compared to 13.55% in 2001. Core profitability continued to improve as net interest income increased by 22.6% and noninterest income was up 9.0%.
Union Bankshares Corporations financial performance in 2002 was significantly influenced by the effect of lower interest rates on both the community bank segment and the mortgage banking segment. Net income for the community bank segment was $12.9 million, an increase of $2.4 million, or 22.7% over 2001. In 2002, reductions in interest rates resulted in a slight decline in interest income while the repricing of deposits and the reduction of rates on other borrowings combined to decrease interest expense and increase net interest income. Net interest income increased $7.0 million or 21.6%, resulting in the highest net interest margin in several years. Noninterest income in the community bank segment grew modestly in 2002 at 3.0%. Service charges and fees, the primary component of noninterest income, increased 8.1% in 2002. Noninterest expense in this sector increased 10.3% while assets grew by over 13.5%. This ability to grow on a stable cost platform has allowed the Company to realize efficiencies from both internal growth and expansion opportunities.
The decline in mortgage interest rates in 2002 stimulated mortgage loan originations and enhanced the financial performance of the Companys mortgage banking segment. Mortgage loan originations in 2002 totaled $385 million and the gains on the sales of those loans totaled $10.1 million, a 13.9% increase over 2001. Net income for the mortgage banking segment was $1.6 million, an improvement of $400,000 over $1.2 million in 2001. This improvement was largely the result of increased volume but continued expense controls resulted in a decrease of $135,000 in noninterest expense excluding salaries and benefits. Refinanced mortgages represented 42% of the mortgage segments loan production for the year as compared to 30% in 2001. The Company continues to focus on developing and maintaining relationships with builders and realtors to generate loan referrals, to provide a more steady source of origination volume in a more stable rate environment.
12
Assets grew to $1.116 billion at December 31, 2002, up 13.5% from $983.1 million a year ago. Loans grew to $714.8 million, up 19.1% over year-end 2001 totals reflecting growth in our loan production in all entities. Deposits increased to $897.6 million at December 31, 2002 from $784.1 million at December 31, 2001, a 14.5% increase. The Companys capital position grew by 18.6%, from $89.0 million at December 31, 2001 to $105.5 million a year later and remains strong at 9.5% of total assets.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income, which represents the principal source of earnings for the Company is the amount by which interest income exceeds interest expense. The net interest margin is net interest income expressed as a percentage of interest-earning assets. Changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as their respective yields and rates, have a significant impact on the level of net interest income, the net interest margin and net income.
Various world and national events over the last two years, including the terrorist attacks and corporate scandals, have contributed to economic uncertainty that appears likely to continue into 2003. This prolonged period of economic weakness resulted in interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve Board that reduced interest rates by 475 basis points in 2001 and an additional 50 basis points in 2002. Although the Company has not seen significant weakening in the economies of the markets it serves, the impact of the interest rate reductions has had a significant impact. During 2002 the Company benefited from the maturity of higher-rate certificates of deposit issued in prior years that were renewed at significantly lower interest rates. The impact of changes in rates on certificates of deposit resulted in a reduction in interest expense of over $6.2 million in 2002. During the same timeframe, lower interest rates resulted in loan prepayments and repricings that reduced interest income on loans by $6.2 million. However, increased loan volumes offset much of that decline, contributing $5.6 million in additional interest income. (see Volume and Rate Analysis table).
During 2002, net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, which reflects the tax benefits of nontaxable interest income, totaled $43.3 million, an increase of 20.8% from $35.9 million in 2001. The Companys net interest margin increased to 4.49% in 2002, as compared to 4.17% in 2001. The yield on earning assets decreased to 7.04% from 7.94% in 2001 while the cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased from 4.42% in 2001 to 3.05% in 2002. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $72.8 million, or 9.9% while average earning assets grew by $104.7 million, or 12.2%. In 2002, deposits increased through both internal growth and the addition of two new branches, which brought $13.9 million in deposits. Many investors left the stock market and chose to maintain their liquidity in bank deposits, which is reflected in the rapid growth in interest-bearing transaction accounts and demand deposit balances. While the margin increased on a year-to-year basis, some compression was seen in the fourth quarter as asset repricing and prepayments accelerated. The majority of the repricing of higher-rate certificates of deposit was completed in 2002. The Company anticipates that interest rates will begin to rise in the second half of 2003 and that in a rising rate environment the net interest margin will improve. However, should interest rates remain at their current levels for an extended time period, the Company would expect additional declines in the yields on investments and loans and would cause the net interest margin to gradually decline over the next several quarters.
During 2001, net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis totaled $35.9 million, an increase of 4.9% from $34.2 million in 2000. The Companys net interest margin declined to 4.17% in 2001, as compared to 4.23% in 2000. The yield on earning assets decreased to 7.94% from 8.39% in 2000 while the cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 4.42% in 2001 from 4.80% in 2000. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $35.3 million, or 5.0% while average earning assets grew by $53.1 million, or 6.6%.
13
The following table shows interest income on earning assets and related average yields, as well as interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities and related average rates paid for the periods indicated.
AVERAGE BALANCES, INCOME AND EXPENSES, YIELDS AND RATES (TAXABLE EQUIVALENT BASIS) YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance |
Interest Income/ Expense |
Yield/ Rate |
Average Balance |
Interest Income/ Expense |
Yield/ Rate |
Average Balance |
Interest Income/ Expense |
Yield/ Rate |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
$ |
168,787 |
|
$ |
9,619 |
5.70 |
% |
$ |
138,175 |
|
$ |
9,125 |
6.60 |
% |
$ |
121,826 |
|
$ |
8,979 |
7.37 |
% | |||||||||
Tax-exempt(1) |
|
91,814 |
|
|
7,015 |
7.64 |
% |
|
91,538 |
|
|
7,039 |
7.69 |
% |
|
97,080 |
|
|
7,424 |
7.65 |
% | |||||||||
Total securities |
|
260,601 |
|
|
16,634 |
6.38 |
% |
|
229,713 |
|
|
16,164 |
7.04 |
% |
|
218,906 |
|
|
16,403 |
7.49 |
% | |||||||||
Loans, net |
|
658,836 |
|
|
49,428 |
7.50 |
% |
|
589,347 |
|
|
50,148 |
8.51 |
% |
|
573,989 |
|
|
50,300 |
8.76 |
% | |||||||||
Loans held for sale |
|
27,606 |
|
|
1,638 |
5.93 |
% |
|
25,862 |
|
|
1,559 |
6.03 |
% |
|
10,864 |
|
|
827 |
7.61 |
% | |||||||||
Federal funds sold |
|
14,153 |
|
|
206 |
1.46 |
% |
|
13,233 |
|
|
412 |
3.11 |
% |
|
2,607 |
|
|
118 |
4.53 |
% | |||||||||
Money market investments |
|
2,778 |
|
|
40 |
1.44 |
% |
|
1,116 |
|
|
23 |
2.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
1,146 |
|
|
17 |
1.48 |
% |
|
1,154 |
|
|
37 |
3.21 |
% |
|
936 |
|
|
59 |
6.30 |
% | |||||||||
Total earning assets |
|
965,120 |
|
|
67,963 |
7.04 |
% |
|
860,425 |
|
|
68,343 |
7.94 |
% |
|
807,302 |
|
|
67,707 |
8.39 |
% | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(8,370 |
) |
|
(7,725 |
) |
|
(7,488 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-earning assets |
|
71,684 |
|
|
69,421 |
|
|
61,449 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ |
1,028,434 |
|
$ |
922,121 |
|
$ |
861,263 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Checking |
$ |
120,878 |
|
|
1,028 |
0.85 |
% |
$ |
100,112 |
|
|
1,646 |
1.64 |
% |
$ |
99,377 |
|
|
2,116 |
2.13 |
% | |||||||||
Money market savings |
|
84,623 |
|
|
1,193 |
1.41 |
% |
|
67,680 |
|
|
1,838 |
2.72 |
% |
|
62,197 |
|
|
2,022 |
3.25 |
% | |||||||||
Regular savings |
|
78,497 |
|
|
1,014 |
1.29 |
% |
|
63,311 |
|
|
1,443 |
2.28 |
% |
|
56,992 |
|
|
1,367 |
2.40 |
% | |||||||||
Certificates of deposit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$100,000 and over |
|
135,429 |
|
|
5,718 |
4.22 |
% |
|
128,117 |
|
|
7,243 |
5.65 |
% |
|
108,740 |
|
|
6,251 |
5.75 |
% | |||||||||
Under $100,000 |
|
286,076 |
|
|
11,506 |
4.02 |
% |
|
269,578 |
|
|
14,970 |
5.55 |
% |
|
258,162 |
|
|
14,756 |
5.72 |
% | |||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
705,503 |
|
|
20,459 |
2.90 |
% |
|
628,798 |
|
|
27,140 |
4.32 |
% |
|
585,468 |
|
|
26,512 |
4.53 |
% | |||||||||
Other borrowings |
|
101,385 |
|
|
4,168 |
4.11 |
% |
|
105,284 |
|
|
5,343 |
5.07 |
% |
|
113,339 |
|
|
7,018 |
6.19 |
% | |||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
806,888 |
|
|
24,627 |
3.05 |
% |
|
734,082 |
|
|
32,483 |
4.42 |
% |
|
698,807 |
|
|
33,530 |
4.80 |
% | |||||||||
Noninterest bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
|
115,552 |
|
|
96,127 |
|
|
86,416 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
|
8,734 |
|
|
5,719 |
|
|
4,951 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
|
931,174 |
|
|
835,928 |
|
|
790,174 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
|
97,260 |
|
|
86,193 |
|
|
71,089 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ |
1,028,434 |
|
$ |
922,121 |
|
$ |
861,263 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ |
43,336 |
$ |
35,860 |
$ |
34,177 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate spread |
3.99 |
% |
3.52 |
% |
3.59 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense as a percent of average earning assets |
2.55 |
% |
3.78 |
% |
4.15 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin |
4.49 |
% |
4.17 |
% |
4.23 |
% |
(1) | Income and yields are reported on a taxable equivalent basis. |
The following table summarizes changes in net interest income attributable to changes in the volume of interest-bearing assets and liabilities compared to changes in interest rates. Nonaccrual loans are included in average loans outstanding.
14
VOLUME AND RATE ANALYSIS* (TAXABLE EQUIVALENT BASIS)
Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 vs. 2001 Increase (Decrease) Due to Changes in: |
2001 vs. 2000 Increase (Decrease) Due to Changes in: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume |
Rate |
Total |
Volume |
Rate |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
EARNING ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
$ |
1,850 |
|
$ |
(1,356 |
) |
$ |
494 |
|
$ |
1,134 |
|
$ |
(988 |
) |
$ |
146 |
| ||||||
Tax-exempt |
|
21 |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
(24 |
) |
|
(425 |
) |
|
40 |
|
|
(385 |
) | ||||||
Loans, net |
|
5,563 |
|
|
(6,283 |
) |
|
(720 |
) |
|
1,327 |
|
|
(1,479 |
) |
|
(152 |
) | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
|
103 |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
79 |
|
|
936 |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
732 |
| ||||||
Federal funds sold |
|
26 |
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
(206 |
) |
|
341 |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
294 |
| ||||||
Money market investments |
|
25 |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
17 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
23 |
| ||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
(20 |
) |
|
11 |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
(22 |
) | ||||||
Total earning assets |
|
7,588 |
|
|
(7,968 |
) |
|
(380 |
) |
|
3,335 |
|
|
(2,699 |
) |
|
636 |
| ||||||
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Checking |
|
291 |
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
(618 |
) |
|
15 |
|
|
(485 |
) |
|
(470 |
) | ||||||
Money market savings |
|
384 |
|
|
(1,029 |
) |
|
(645 |
) |
|
168 |
|
|
(352 |
) |
|
(184 |
) | ||||||
Regular savings |
|
292 |
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
(429 |
) |
|
146 |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
76 |
| ||||||
CDs $100,000 and over |
|
394 |
|
|
(1,919 |
) |
|
(1,525 |
) |
|
1,097 |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
992 |
| ||||||
CDs < $100,000 |
|
870 |
|
|
(4,334 |
) |
|
(3,464 |
) |
|
641 |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
214 |
| ||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
2,231 |
|
|
(8,912 |
) |
|
(6,681 |
) |
|
2,067 |
|
|
(1,439 |
) |
|
628 |
| ||||||
Other borrowings |
|
(192 |
) |
|
(983 |
) |
|
(1,175 |
) |
|
(474 |
) |
|
(1,201 |
) |
|
(1,675 |
) | ||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
2,039 |
|
|
(9,895 |
) |
|
(7,856 |
) |
|
1,593 |
|
|
(2,640 |
) |
|
(1,047 |
) | ||||||
Change in net interest income |
$ |
5,549 |
|
$ |
1,927 |
|
$ |
7,476 |
|
$ |
1,742 |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
$ |
1,683 |
| ||||||
* | The change in interest, due to both rate and volume, has been allocated to change due to volume and change due to rate in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each. |
INTEREST SENSITIVITY
An important element of earnings performance and the maintenance of sufficient liquidity is proper management of the interest sensitivity gap. The interest sensitivity gap is the difference between interest sensitive assets and interest sensitive liabilities in a specific time interval. This gap can be managed by repricing assets or liabilities, which are variable rate instruments, by replacing an asset or liability at maturity or by adjusting the interest rate during the life of the asset or liability. Matching the amounts of assets and liabilities maturing in the same time interval helps to hedge interest rate risk and to minimize the impact of rising or falling interest rates on net interest income.
The Company determines the overall magnitude of interest sensitivity risk and then formulates policies governing asset generation and pricing, funding sources and pricing, and off-balance sheet commitments. These decisions are based on managements expectations regarding future interest rate movements, the state of the national and regional economy, and other financial and business risk factors. The Company uses computer simulations to measure the effect of various interest rate scenarios on net interest income. This modeling reflects interest rate changes and the related impact on net interest income and net income over specified time horizons.
At December 31, 2002, the Company had $168.1 million more assets than liabilities subject to repricing within one year and was, therefore, in an asset-sensitive position. An asset-sensitive Company generally will be impacted favorably by increasing interest rates while a liability-sensitive companys net interest margin and net interest income generally will be impacted favorably by declining interest rates. At December 31, 2001, the Company had $148.3 million more liabilities than assets subject to repricing within one year.
15
Although the gap report shows the Company to be asset-sensitive, computer simulation shows the Companys net interest income tends to increase when interest rates rise and fall when interest rates decline. The explanation for this is that interest rate changes affect bank products differently. For example, if the prime rate changes by 1.00% (100 basis points or bps), the change on certificates of deposit may only be 0.75% (75 bps), while other interest bearing deposit accounts may only change 0.10% (10 bps). Also, despite their fixed terms, loan products are often refinanced as rates decline but rarely refinanced as rates rise. In 2002, with slightly declining rates, the market stayed in a more normal curve. Liabilities repriced early in the year while assets repriced throughout the year resulting in an increase in net interest income.
EARNINGS SIMULATION ANALYSIS
Management uses simulation analysis to measure the sensitivity of net interest income to changes in interest rates. The model calculates an earnings estimate based on current and projected balances and rates. This method is subject to the accuracy of the assumptions that underlie the process, but it provides a better analysis of the sensitivity of earnings to changes in interest rates than other analysis such as the static gap analysis discussed above.
Assumptions used in the model are derived from historical trends and managements outlook and include loan and deposit growth rates and projected yields and rates. All maturities, calls and prepayments in the securities portfolio are assumed to be reinvested in like instruments. Mortgage loans and mortgage backed securities prepayment assumptions are based on industry estimates of prepayment speeds for portfolios with similar coupon ranges and seasoning. Different interest rate scenarios and yield curves are used to measure the sensitivity of earnings to changing interest rates. Interest rates on different asset and liability accounts move differently when the prime rate changes and are reflected in the different rate scenarios.
The following table represents the interest rate sensitivity on net interest income for the Company using different rate scenarios:
Change in Prime Rate |
% Change in Net Interest Income | |
+200 basis points |
6.0% | |
Flat |
0 | |
-200 basis points |
-3.1% |
ECONOMIC VALUE SIMULATION
Economic value simulation is used to calculate the estimated fair value of assets and liabilities over different interest rate environments. Economic values are calculated based on discounted cash flow analysis. The net economic value is the economic value of all assets minus the market value of all liabilities. The change in net economic value over different rate environments is an indication of the larger term repricing risk in the balance sheet. The same assumptions are used in the economic value simulation as in the earnings simulation. The following chart reflects the change in net economic value over different rate environments:
16
Change in Prime Rate |
Change in Net Market Value (Dollars in Thousands) | |
+200 basis points |
$6,885 | |
+100 basis points |
5,107 | |
Flat |
0 | |
-100 basis points |
-7,404 | |
-200 basis points |
-17,993 |
NONINTEREST INCOME
Noninterest income increased by 9.0% from $16.1 million in 2001 to $17.5 million in 2002. This increase is primarily due to a $1.2 million increase in gains on sales of loans, which rose from $8.9 million in 2001 to $10.1 million in 2002. The growth in mortgage originations, stimulated by low mortgage interest rates, led to this increase. Service charges on deposits rose 11.5% from $3.7 million to $4.1 million. Other service charges, commissions and fee income were up slightly from $2.5 million in 2001 to $2.6 million as ATM fees continued to grow while brokerage commissions were slowed by the down stock market. A securities loss of $159,000 represents a $284,000 change from gains of $125,000 a year ago. This was partially offset by gains on the sale of other real estate and fixed assets as a result of sales of a former branch site and several nonperforming asset properties. In addition, other operating income was down from $906,000 in 2001 to $800,000 in 2002. This decline was principally the result of a decrease in the earnings rate on bank owned life insurance.
In 2001, noninterest income increased by 34.0% from $12.0 million in 2000 to $16.1 million in 2001. This increase was primarily attributable to a $3.3 million increase in gains on sales of loans, which increased from $5.5 million in 2000 to $8.9 million in 2001 as mortgage originations increased. In addition, other operating income was up from $498,000 in 2000 to $906,000 in 2001. The rise was principally the result of increases in the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance. Other service charges, commissions and fee income were up $325,000 from $2.2 million in 2000 to $2.5 million as brokerage fees and ATM fees continued to grow. Service charges on deposits rose slightly from $3.6 million to $3.7 million.
In the third quarter of 2000, the Company restructured its securities portfolio, selling lower-yielding securities to invest in higher-yielding instruments and resulting in a loss of $1.1 million. In the same quarter, the Company completed the termination of its defined benefit plan resulting in a $1.1 million gain. In connection with the termination of the defined benefit plan, the Company redirected a portion of the expense of the prior plan to enhance the existing compensation of employees to be more competitive with the market. The net impact of these two nonrecurring transactions on noninterest income was minimal.
NONINTEREST EXPENSES
Noninterest expenses totaled $35.9 million in 2002, an increase of $3.5 million versus $32.4 million in 2001. Salaries and benefits were $21.3 million in 2002, up $2.2 million or 11.6% compared to $19.1 million in 2001. The increase in mortgage loan originations and gains on loan sales within the mortgage segment resulted in an increase of $1.1 million in salaries and benefits of which $572,000 was commission compensation. The community bank segments salaries and benefits were up $1.1 million year-to-year. This was the result of two new branches, a loan production office in Manassas, Virginia, higher group insurance, some increased support staffing and normal increases. Occupancy expenses were $2.3 million, up $139,000 over $2.2 million in 2001. Equipment expense was down slightly at $2.7 million versus $2.9 million in 2001. Other operating expense was $9.5 million up $1.2 million compared to $8.3 million in 2001. This was the result of increases in operating expense, marketing, other taxes and other expenses rose. Much of these increased costs were related to the new
17
locations, new product advertising, Centennial celebrations at two of the Companys Community Banks and operating costs and core deposit expenses.
Noninterest expenses totaled $32.4 million in 2001, flat versus $32.4 million in 2000. Salaries and benefits were $19.1 million in 2001, up $373,000 or 2.0% compared to $18.7 million in 2000. The increase in mortgage loan production and gains on loan sales within the mortgage segment resulted in an increase of $1.2 million in commission compensation but this was largely offset by a decrease in salaries of $700,000. This reflects reductions in staffing related to the closing of mortgages offices and severance payments in 2000. The community bank segments salaries and benefits expenses were flat year-to-year. Occupancy expenses were $2.2 million, down $121,000 over $2.3 million in 2000. Equipment expense was down slightly at $2.9 million versus $3.0 million in 2000. Other operating expense was $8.3 million down slightly compared to $8.4 million in 2000. This was the result of professional fees being down while marketing, other taxes and other expenses rose. Much of these cost efficiencies are attributable to the consolidation of virtually all back office functions and the Companys investment in technology.
LOAN PORTFOLIO
Loans, net of unearned income, totaled $714.8 million at December 31, 2002, an increase of 19.1% over $600.2 million at December 31, 2001. Loans secured by real estate represent the Companys largest category, comprising 72.2% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2002. Of this total, 1-4 family residential loans, not including home equity lines, comprised 26.6% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2002, down slightly from 28.2% in 2001. Loans secured by commercial real estate comprised 28.0% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2002, as compared to 25.8% in 2001, and consist of income producing properties, as well as commercial and industrial loans where real estate constitutes a secondary source of collateral. Real estate construction loans accounted for 11.9% of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2002. The Companys charge-off rate for all loans secured by real estate has historically been low.
LOAN PORTFOLIO
DECEMBER 31, | |||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 | |||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ |
78,289 |
$ |
70,739 |
$ |
74,261 |
$ |
67,649 |
$ |
61,678 | |||||
Loans to finance agriculture production and other loans to farmers |
|
1,128 |
|
4,075 |
|
2,793 |
|
3,015 |
|
2,595 | |||||
Real estate: |
|||||||||||||||
Real estate construction |
|
85,335 |
|
57,940 |
|
33,560 |
|
33,218 |
|
38,128 | |||||
Real estate mortgage: |
|||||||||||||||
Residential (1-4 family) |
|
190,427 |
|
169,426 |
|
177,282 |
|
179,246 |
|
155,843 | |||||
Home equity lines |
|
32,320 |
|
24,474 |
|
20,049 |
|
20,987 |
|
18,737 | |||||
Multi-family |
|
3,066 |
|
3,418 |
|
4,666 |
|
4,592 |
|
3,979 | |||||
Commercial (1) |
|
200,125 |
|
155,093 |
|
139,737 |
|
120,490 |
|
108,063 | |||||
Agriculture |
|
4,466 |
|
2,497 |
|
2,859 |
|
2,373 |
|
2,536 | |||||
Total real estate |
|
515,739 |
|
412,848 |
|
378,153 |
|
360,906 |
|
327,286 | |||||
Loans to individuals: |
|||||||||||||||
Consumer |
|
102,528 |
|
94,620 |
|
107,876 |
|
102,713 |
|
79,492 | |||||
Credit card |
|
5,350 |
|
4,140 |
|
4,958 |
|
4,346 |
|
3,232 | |||||
Total loans to individuals |
|
107,878 |
|
98,760 |
|
112,834 |
|
107,059 |
|
82,724 | |||||
All other loans |
|
11,836 |
|
14,048 |
|
13,507 |
|
5,855 |
|
6,559 | |||||
Total loans |
|
714,870 |
|
600,470 |
|
581,548 |
|
544,484 |
|
480,842 | |||||
Less unearned income |
|
106 |
|
306 |
|
758 |
|
1,117 |
|
1,020 | |||||
Total net loans |
$ |
714,764 |
$ |
600,164 |
$ |
580,790 |
$ |
543,367 |
$ |
479,822 | |||||
The Companys consumer loan portfolio, its second largest category, consists principally of installment loans. Total loans to individuals for household, family and other personal expenditures
18
totaled 14.3% of total loans at December 31, 2002, down from 15.8% in 2001. The increased competition for automobile loans including zero percent financing by automobile companies continued to impact this portfolio significantly in 2002. Commercial loans, secured by non-real estate business assets comprised 11.0% of total loans at the end of 2002, a slight decrease from 11.8% at the end of 2001. Loans to the agricultural industry totaled less than 1.0% of the loan portfolio in each of the last five years.
REMAINING MATURITIES OF SELECTED LOANS
VARIABLE RATE: |
FIXED RATE: | |||||||||||||||||
Within 1 year |
1 to 5 years |
After 5 years |
Total |
1 to 5 years |
After 5 years |
Total |
Total maturities | |||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ |
39,699 |
6,161 |
|
6,161 |
27,555 |
4,874 |
32,429 |
$ |
78,289 | ||||||||
Real Estate Construction |
$ |
77,827 |
1,239 |
|
1,239 |
2,470 |
3,799 |
6,269 |
$ |
85,335 |
Loans, net of unearned income, totaled $600.2 million at December 31, 2001, an increase of 3.3% over $580.8 million at December 31, 2000, fueled largely by commercial real estate and commercial loan growth.
The Company is focused on providing community-based financial services and discourages the origination of portfolio loans outside of its principal trade area. The Company maintains a policy not to originate or purchase loans to foreign entities or loans classified by regulators as highly leveraged transactions. To manage the growth of the real estate loans in the loan portfolio, facilitate asset/liability management and generate additional fee income, the Company sells a portion of conforming first mortgage residential real estate loans to the secondary market as they are originated. Mortgage Capital Investors, Inc. serves as a mortgage brokerage operation, selling the majority of its loan production in the secondary market or selling loans to the affiliated banks that meet the banks current asset/liability management needs. This venture has provided the banks customers with enhanced mortgage products and the Company with improved efficiencies through the consolidation of this function.
ASSET QUALITYALLOWANCE/PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of the amount adequate to provide for potential losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Among other factors, management considers the Companys historical loss experience, the size and composition of the loan portfolio, the value and adequacy of collateral and guarantors, non-performing credits and current and anticipated economic conditions. There are additional risks of future loan losses, which cannot be precisely quantified nor attributed to particular loans or classes of loans. Because those risks include general economic trends as well as conditions affecting individual borrowers, the allowance for loan losses is an estimate. The allowance is also subject to regulatory examinations and determination as to adequacy, which may take into account such factors as the methodology used to calculate the allowance and size of the allowance in comparison to peer companies identified by regulatory agencies.
Management maintains a list of loans which have a potential weakness that may need special attention. This list is used to monitor such loans and is used in the determination of the sufficiency of the Companys allowance for loan losses. As of December 31, 2002, the allowance for loan losses was $9.2 million or 1.28% of total loans as compared to $7.3 million, or 1.22% in 2001. The provision for loan losses was $2.9 million in 2002 and $2.1 million in 2001.
19
The allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2001 was $7.3 million or 1.22% of total loans as compared to $7.4 million, or 1.27% in 2000. The provision for loan losses in both 2001 and 2000 was $2.1 million.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
DECEMBER 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
$ |
7,336 |
|
$ |
7,389 |
|
$ |
6,617 |
|
$ |
6,407 |
|
$ |
4,798 |
| |||||
Loans charged-off: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
|
310 |
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
777 |
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
597 |
| |||||
Real estate |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
48 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
34 |
| |||||
Consumer |
|
1,271 |
|
|
880 |
|
|
825 |
|
|
746 |
|
|
1,078 |
| |||||
Total loans charged-off |
|
1,581 |
|
|
2,599 |
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
1,709 |
| |||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
|
245 |
|
|
154 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
126 |
| |||||
Real estate |
|
33 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
18 |
| |||||
Consumer |
|
268 |
|
|
251 |
|
|
295 |
|
|
326 |
|
|
130 |
| |||||
Total recoveries |
|
546 |
|
|
420 |
|
|
321 |
|
|
346 |
|
|
274 |
| |||||
Net loans charged-off |
|
1,035 |
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
1,435 |
| |||||
Provision for loan losses |
|
2,878 |
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
2,216 |
|
|
3,044 |
| |||||
Balance, end of year |
$ |
9,179 |
|
$ |
7,336 |
|
$ |
7,389 |
|
$ |
6,617 |
|
$ |
6,407 |
| |||||
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding at end of year |
|
1.28 |
% |
|
1.22 |
% |
|
1.27 |
% |
|
1.22 |
% |
|
1.33 |
% | |||||
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during year |
|
0.16 |
% |
|
0.37 |
% |
|
0.23 |
% |
|
0.40 |
% |
|
0.32 |
% |
The table below shows an allocation among loan categories based upon analysis of the loan portfolios composition, historical loan loss experience, and other factors and the ratio of the related outstanding loan balances to total loans.
(Percent is loans in category divided by total loans.)
ALLOCATION OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance |
Percent |
Allowance |
Percent |
Allowance |
Percent |
Allowance |
Percent |
Allowance |
Percent |
|||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial and agriculture |
$ |
3,249 |
11.1 |
% |
$ |
2,846 |
12.5 |
% |
$ |
3,369 |
13.3 |
% |
$ |
3,215 |
13.0 |
% |
$ |
3,382 |
13.4 |
% | ||||||||||
Real estate construction |
|
3,492 |
11.9 |
% |
|
2,205 |
9.7 |
% |
|
1,467 |
5.8 |
% |
|
1,511 |
6.1 |
% |
|
2,007 |
7.9 |
% | ||||||||||
Real estate mortgage |
|
426 |
60.2 |
% |
|
383 |
59.1 |
% |
|
406 |
59.3 |
% |
|
264 |
59.7 |
% |
|
189 |
60.3 |
% | ||||||||||
Consumer & other |
|
2,012 |
16.8 |
% |
|
1,902 |
18.7 |
% |
|
2,147 |
21.6 |
% |
|
1,627 |
21.2 |
% |
|
829 |
18.4 |
% | ||||||||||
$ |
9,179 |
100.0 |
% |
$ |
7,336 |
100.0 |
% |
$ |
7,389 |
100.0 |
% |
$ |
6,617 |
100.0 |
% |
$ |
6,407 |
100.0 |
% | |||||||||||
NONPERFORMING ASSETS
Nonperforming assets were $910,000 at December 31, 2002, down from $1.7 million at December 31, 2001. Nonaccrual loans decreased to $136,000 in 2002 from $915,000 in 2001 and foreclosed properties were up from $639,000 in 2001 to $774,000 in 2002.
20
NONPERFORMING ASSETS
DECEMBER 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans |
$ |
136 |
|
$ |
915 |
|
$ |
830 |
|
$ |
1,487 |
|
$ |
2,813 |
| |||||
Foreclosed properties |
|
774 |
|
|
639 |
|
|
844 |
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
1,101 |
| |||||
Real estate investment |
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
867 |
|
|
903 |
|
|
730 |
| |||||
Total nonperforming assets |
$ |
910 |
|
$ |
1,683 |
|
$ |
2,541 |
|
$ |
3,503 |
|
$ |
4,644 |
| |||||
Loans past due 90 days and accruing interest |
$ |
896 |
|
$ |
2,757 |
|
$ |
1,531 |
|
$ |
980 |
|
$ |
2,979 |
| |||||
Nonperforming assets to year-end loans, foreclosed properties and real estate investment |
|
0.13 |
% |
|
0.28 |
% |
|
0.44 |
% |
|
0.64 |
% |
|
0.97 |
% | |||||
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans |
|
6749.26 |
% |
|
801.75 |
% |
|
890.24 |
% |
|
444.99 |
% |
|
227.73 |
% |
Most of the nonperforming assets are secured by real estate within the Companys trade area. Based on the estimated fair values of the related real estate, management considers these amounts to be recoverable, with any individual deficiency considered in the allowance for loan losses. As of December 31, 2002, all nonperforming assets representing an investment in income-producing property and included in other assets have been sold at no additional loss to the Company.
At December 31, 2001, nonperforming assets totaled $1.7 million, down from $2.5 million at December 31, 2000. Nonaccrual loans increased by $85,000 in 2001 while foreclosed properties declined by $205,000.
21
SECURITIES
At December 31, 2002, all $272.8 million of the Companys securities were classified as available for sale, as compared to $257.1 million at December 31, 2001. Investment securities which totaled $5.5 million at December 31, 2000 were transferred to the available for sale classification as permitted in the implementation of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities in 2001.
The Company seeks to diversify its portfolio to minimize risk and to maintain a large amount of securities issued by states and political subdivisions due to the tax benefits such securities provide. It also purchases mortgage backed securities because of the reinvestment opportunities from the cash flows and the higher yield offered from these securities. The investment portfolio has a high percentage of municipals and mortgage backed securities, which is the main reason for the high taxable equivalent yield the portfolio attains compared to its peers. The Company does not have any derivative or hedging activities.
MATURITIES OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
DECEMBER 31, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||
1 YEAR OR LESS |
1-5 YEARS |
5-10 YEARS |
OVER 10 YEARS & EQUITY SECURITIES |
TOTAL |
||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agency securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized cost |
$ |
999 |
|
$ |
16,302 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
17,301 |
| |||||
Fair value |
|
1,010 |
|
|
16,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,455 |
| |||||
Weighted average yield(1) |
|
2.65 |
% |
|
3.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.15 |
% | |||||
Mortgage backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized cost |
$ |
18 |
|
$ |
1,986 |
|
$ |
24,863 |
|
$ |
51,528 |
|
$ |
78,395 |
| |||||
Fair value |
|
18 |
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
25,484 |
|
|
53,303 |
|
|
80,886 |
| |||||
Weighted average yield(1) |
|
6.47 |
% |
|
7.19 |
% |
|
5.15 |
% |
|
5.78 |
% |
|
5.62 |
% | |||||
Municipal bonds: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized cost |
$ |
4,757 |
|
$ |
22,543 |
|
$ |
20,558 |
|
$ |
49,418 |
|
$ |
97,276 |
| |||||
Fair value |
|
4,816 |
|
|
23,532 |
|
|
21,650 |
|
|
51,715 |
|
|
101,713 |
| |||||
Weighted average yield(1) |
|
7.07 |
% |
|
7.33 |
% |
|
7.08 |
% |
|
7.00 |
% |
|
7.09 |
% | |||||
Other securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized cost |
$ |
9,073 |
|
$ |
28,913 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
31,352 |
|
$ |
69,338 |
| |||||
Fair value |
|
9,119 |
|
|
30,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
33,560 |
|
|
72,701 |
| |||||
Weighted average yield(1) |
|
4.46 |
% |
|
4.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
8.43 |
% |
|
6.31 |
% | |||||
Total securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized cost |
$ |
14,847 |
|
$ |
69,744 |
|
$ |
45,421 |
|
$ |
132,298 |
|
$ |
262,310 |
| |||||
Fair value |
|
14,963 |
|
|
72,080 |
|
|
47,134 |
|
|
138,578 |
|
|
272,755 |
| |||||
Weighted average yield(1) |
|
5.17 |
% |
|
5.34 |
% |
|
6.02 |
% |
|
6.86 |
% |
|
6.22 |
% |
(1) Yields on tax-exempt securities have been computed on a tax-equivalent basis.
DEPOSITS
Total deposits grew $113.6 million or 14.5% in 2002 with deposits in existing branches accounting for most of that growth. The Company also opened two new branches, which had deposits of $13.8 million at year-end. Increased competition for customer deposits continues to be a challenge for the Company and the Company continues to focus on customer relationships and delivery of financial products and services to those customers.
Total deposits increased from $784.1 million at December 31, 2001 to $897.6 million at December 31, 2002. Over this same period, average interest-bearing deposits were $705.5 million, or 12.2% over
22
the 2001 average of $628.8 million. A $20.8 million increase in NOW accounts, a $16.9 million increase in money market accounts and a $23.8 million increase in certificates of deposits represent the majority of the increase in average deposits. In 2002, the Companys lowest cost source of funds, noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased by a total of $23.3 million helping to reduce the overall cost of funds. On an average balance basis, demand deposits were up $19.4 million compared to 2001. The Company has no brokered deposits.
AVERAGE DEPOSITS AND RATES PAID
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||||||||
AMOUNT |
RATE |
AMOUNT |
RATE |
AMOUNT |
RATE |
|||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
$ |
115,552 |
|
|
$ |
96,127 |
|
|
$ |
86,416 |
|
| ||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||
NOW accounts |
|
120,878 |
0.85 |
% |
|
100,112 |
1.64 |
% |
|
99,377 |
2.13 |
% | ||||||
Money market accounts |
|
84,623 |
1.41 |
% |
|
67,680 |
2.72 |
% |
|
62,197 |
3.25 |
% | ||||||
Savings accounts |
|
78,497 |
1.29 |
% |
|
63,311 |
2.28 |
% |
|
56,992 |
2.40 |
% | ||||||
Time deposits of $100,000 and over |
|
135,429 |
4.22 |
% |
|
128,117 |
5.65 |
% |
|
108,740 |
5.75 |
% | ||||||
Other time deposits |
|
286,076 |
4.02 |
% |
|
269,578 |
5.55 |
% |
|
258,16 |
5.72 |
% | ||||||
Total interest-bearing |
|
705,503 |
2.90 |
% |
|
628,798 |
4.32 |
% |
|
585,468 |
4.53 |
% | ||||||
Total average deposits |
$ |
821,055 |
$ |
724,925 |
$ |
671,884 |
||||||||||||
MATURITIES OF CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT OF $100,000 AND OVER
WITHIN 3 MONTHS |
36 MONTHS |
612 MONTHS |
OVER 12 MONTHS |
TOTAL |
PERCENT OF TOTAL DEPOSITS |
|||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2002 |
$ |
20,112 |
$ |
15,232 |
$ |
16,994 |
$ |
100,630 |
$ |
152,968 |
17.04 |
% |
Total deposits grew from $692.5 million at December 31, 2000 to $784.1 million at December 31, 2001. Over this same period, average interest-bearing deposits were $628.8 million, or 7.4% over the 2000 average of $585.5 million. The Company also acquired about $14.9 million in deposits from another institution through the purchase of a branch in the 4th quarter of 2001.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital resources represent funds, earned or obtained, over which financial institutions can exercise greater or longer control in comparison with deposits and borrowed funds. The adequacy of the Companys capital is reviewed by Management on an ongoing basis with reference to size, composition, and quality of the Companys resources and consistency with regulatory requirements and industry standards. Management seeks to maintain a capital structure that will assure an adequate level of capital to support anticipated asset growth and to absorb potential losses, yet allow management to effectively leverage its capital to maximize return to shareholders.
The Federal Reserve Board, along with the OCC and the FDIC, has adopted capital guidelines to supplement the existing definitions of capital for regulatory purposes and to establish minimum capital standards. Specifically, the guidelines categorize assets and off-balance sheet items into four risk-weighed categories. The minimum ratio of qualifying total assets is 8.0%, of which 4.0% must be Tier 1 capital, consisting of common equity, retained earnings and a limited amount of perpetual
preferred stock, less certain goodwill items. The Company had a ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 12.15% and 12.16% on December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Companys ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets was 11.05% and 11.14% at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Both of these ratios exceeded the fully phased-in capital requirements in 2002 and 2001. The Companys strategic plan includes a targeted equity to asset ratio between 8% and 9%.
23
ANALYSIS OF CAPITAL
DECEMBER 31, |
||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital: |
||||||||||||
Common stock |
$ |
15,159 |
|
$ |
15,052 |
|
$ |
15,033 |
| |||
Surplus |
|
1,442 |
|
|
446 |
|
|
403 |
| |||
Retained earnings |
|
81,997 |
|
|
71,419 |
|
|
63,201 |
| |||
Total equity |
|
98,598 |
|
|
86,917 |
|
|
78,637 |
| |||
Less: core deposit intangibles/goodwill |
|
(6,342 |
) |
|
(6,924 |
) |
|
(6,295 |
) | |||
Total Tier 1 capital |
|
92,256 |
|
|
79,993 |
|
|
72,342 |
| |||
Tier 2 capital: |
||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
|
9,179 |
|
|
7,336 |
|
|
7,389 |
| |||
Total Tier 2 capital |
|
9,179 |
|
|
7,336 |
|
|
7,389 |
| |||
Total risk-based capital |
$ |
101,435 |
|
$ |
87,329 |
|
$ |
79,731 |
| |||
Risk-weighted assets |
$ |
834,560 |
|
$ |
718,225 |
|
$ |
674,687 |
| |||
Capital ratios: |
||||||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio |
|
11.05 |
% |
|
11.14 |
% |
|
10.72 |
% | |||
Total risk-based capital ratio |
|
12.15 |
% |
|
12.16 |
% |
|
11.82 |
% | |||
Tier 1 capital to average adjusted total assets |
|
8.49 |
% |
|
8.35 |
% |
|
8.46 |
% | |||
Equity to total assets |
|
9.46 |
% |
|
9.05 |
% |
|
8.88 |
% |
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity represents an institutions ability to meet present and future financial obligations through either the sale or maturity of existing assets or the acquisition of additional funds through liability management. Liquid assets include cash, interest-bearing deposits with banks, Federal funds sold, investments and loans maturing within one year. The Companys ability to obtain deposits and purchase funds at favorable rates determines its liability liquidity. As a result of the Companys management of liquid assets and the ability to generate liquidity through liability funding, management believes that the Company maintains overall liquidity, which is sufficient to satisfy its depositors requirements and to meet it customers credit needs.
At December 31, 2002, cash and cash equivalents and securities classified as available for sale were 28.6% of total assets, compared to 30.1% at December 31, 2001. Asset liquidity is also provided by managing loan and securities maturities and cash flows.
Additional sources of liquidity available to the Company include its capacity to borrow additional funds when necessary. The subsidiary banks maintain Federal funds lines with several regional banks totaling approximately $63.8 million at December 31, 2002. At year-end 2002, the banks had outstanding $43.2 million of borrowings pursuant to securities sold under agreements to repurchase transactions with a maturity of one day. The Company also had a line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta for $415 million at December 31, 2002.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2001, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued Statement of Position (SOP) No. 01-6, Accounting by Certain Entities (Including Entities with Trade Receivables) That Lend to or Finance the Activities of Others, to reconcile and conform the
24
accounting and financial reporting provisions established by various AICPA industry audit guides. SOP No. 01-6 is effective for annual and interim financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, and did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
On March 13, 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) determined that commitments for the origination of mortgage loans that will be held for sale must be accounted for as derivatives instruments, effective for fiscal quarters beginning after April 10, 2002. The Community Banks enter into commitments to originate loans whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding. Such rate lock commitments on mortgage loans to be sold in the secondary market are considered derivatives. Accordingly, these commitments including any fees received from the potential borrower are recorded at fair value in derivative assets or liabilities, with changes in fair value recorded in the net gain or loss on sale of mortgage loans. Fair value is based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, and for fixed-rate commitments also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The cumulative effect of adopting SFAS No. 133 for rate lock commitments as of December 31, 2002, was not material. The Company originally adopted SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, on January 1, 2001.
In April 2002, FASB issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. The amendment to SFAS No. 13, eliminates an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. SFAS No. 145 also amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed conditions. The provisions of SFAS No. 145 related to the rescission of SFAS No. 4 are in effect for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The provisions of SFAS No. 145 related to SFAS No. 13 are effective for transactions occurring after May 15, 2002, with early application encouraged.
In June 2002, FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. SFAS No. 146 requires recognition of a liability, when incurred, for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity. The liability should be measured at fair value. The provisions of SFAS No. 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Accordingly, goodwill is no longer subject to amortization over its estimated useful life, but is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair value based test. Additionally, SFAS No. 142 requires that acquired intangible assets (such as core deposit intangibles) be separately recognized if the benefit of the asset can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, and amortized over their estimated useful life. Branch acquisition transactions were outside the scope of SFAS No. 142 and therefore any intangible asset arising from such transactions remained subject to amortization over their estimated useful life.
In October 2002, FASB issued SFAS No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions. SFAS No. 147 amends previous interpretive guidance on the application of the purchase method of accounting to acquisitions of financial institutions, and requires the application of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 142 to branch acquisitions if such transactions meet the definition of a business combination. The provisions of SFAS No. 147 do not apply to transactions between two or more mutual enterprises. In addition, SFAS No. 147 amends SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, to include in its scope core deposit intangibles of financial institutions. Accordingly, such intangibles are subject to a recoverability test based on undiscounted cash flows, and to the impairment recognition and measurement provisions required for other long-lived assets held and used.
25
The adoption of SFAS Nos. 142, 145, 146 and 147 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure, an amendment of Statement No. 123, in December 2002. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. Finally, SFAS No. 148 amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosure about the effects of stock options in interim financial information. The amendments to SFAS No. 123 are effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The amendments to APB No. 28 are effective for financial reports containing condensed financial statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. Early application is encouraged for both amendments. The Company continues to record stock options under APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and has not adopted the alternative methods allowable under SFAS No. 148.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this report may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements that include projections, predictions, expectations or beliefs about future events or results or otherwise are not statements of historical fact. Such statements are often characterized by the use of qualified words (and their derivatives) such as expect, believe, estimate, plan, project, or other statements concerning opinions or judgment of the Company and its management about future events. Although the Company believes that its expectations with respect to certain forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions within the bounds of its existing knowledge of its business and operations, there can be no assurance that actual results, performance or achievements of the Company will not differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Actual future results and trends may differ materially from historical results or those anticipated depending on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the effects of and changes in: general economic conditions, the interest rate environment, legislative and regulatory requirements, competitive pressures, new products and delivery systems, inflation, changes in the stock and bond markets, technology, and consumer spending and savings habits. We do not update any forward-looking statements that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.
26
QUARTERLY RESULTS
The table below lists the Companys quarterly performance for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001.
2002 | |||||||||||||||
FOURTH |
THIRD |
SECOND |
FIRST |
TOTAL | |||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | |||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ |
16,778 |
$ |
16,441 |
$ |
16,119 |
$ |
15,867 |
$ |
65,205 | |||||
Interest expense |
|
6,206 |
|
6,114 |
|
6,072 |
|
6,235 |
|
24,627 | |||||
Net interest income |
|
10,572 |
|
10,327 |
|
10,047 |
|
9,632 |
|
40,578 | |||||
Provision for loan losses |
|
659 |
|
650 |
|
739 |
|
830 |
|
2,878 | |||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
9,913 |
|
9,677 |
|
9,308 |
|
8,802 |
|
37,700 | |||||
Noninterest income |
|
5,154 |
|
4,724 |
|
3,832 |
|
3,828 |
|
17,538 | |||||
Noninterest expenses |
|
9,557 |
|
9,067 |
|
8,649 |
|
8,649 |
|
35,922 | |||||
Income before income taxes |
|
5,510 |
|
5,334 |
|
4,491 |
|
3,981 |
|
19,316 | |||||
Income tax expense |
|
1,527 |
|
1,323 |
|
1,038 |
|
923 |
|
4,811 | |||||
Net income |
$ |
3,983 |
$ |
4,011 |
$ |
3,453 |
$ |
3,058 |
$ |
14,505 | |||||
Net income per share |
|||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ |
0.52 |
$ |
0.53 |
$ |
0.46 |
$ |
0.41 |
$ |
1.92 | |||||
Diluted |
$ |
0.52 |
$ |
0.52 |
$ |
0.46 |
$ |
0.40 |
$ |
1.90 | |||||
2001 | |||||||||||||||
FOURTH |
THIRD |
SECOND |
FIRST |
TOTAL | |||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | |||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ |
16,007 |
$ |
16,477 |
$ |
16,489 |
$ |
16,603 |
$ |
65,576 | |||||
Interest expense |
|
7,203 |
|
8,083 |
|
8,531 |
|
8,666 |
|
32,483 | |||||
Net interest income |
|
8,804 |
|
8,394 |
|
7,958 |
|
7,937 |
|
33,093 | |||||
Provision for loan losses |
|
846 |
|
455 |
|
393 |
|
432 |
|
2,126 | |||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
7,958 |
|
7,939 |
|
7,565 |
|
7,505 |
|
30,967 | |||||
Noninterest income |
|
4,323 |
|
4,067 |
|
4,089 |
|
3,613 |
|
16,092 | |||||
Noninterest expenses |
|
8,626 |
|
8,092 |
|
7,971 |
|
7,758 |
|
32,447 | |||||
Income before income taxes |
|
3,655 |
|
3,914 |
|
3,683 |
|
3,360 |
|
14,612 | |||||
Income tax expense |
|
569 |
|
877 |
|
797 |
|
690 |
|
2,933 | |||||
Net income |
$ |
3,086 |
$ |
3,037 |
$ |
2,886 |
$ |
2,670 |
$ |
11,679 | |||||
Net income per share |
|||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ |
0.41 |
$ |
0.40 |
$ |
0.38 |
$ |
0.36 |
$ |
1.55 | |||||
Diluted |
$ |
0.41 |
$ |
0.40 |
$ |
0.38 |
$ |
0.35 |
$ |
1.55 | |||||
27
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
This information is incorporated herein by reference from Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, on pages 15 through 17 of this Form 10-K.
28
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
To the Stockholders and Directors
Union Bankshares Corporation
Bowling Green, Virginia
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Union Bankshares Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of Mortgage Capital Investors, a consolidated subsidiary, which statements reflect total assets and revenue constituting 4% and 14%, respectively, in 2002, 5% and 13%, respectively, in 2001, 2% and 8%, respectively, in 2000, of the related consolidated totals. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Mortgage Capital Investors, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Union Bankshares Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C.
Winchester, Virginia
January 15, 2003
29
UNION BANK SHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2002 and 2001
2002 |
2001 | |||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||
ASSETS |
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: |
||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ |
29,104 |
$ |
28,769 | ||
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
909 |
|
462 | ||
Money market investments |
|
15,142 |
|
2,023 | ||
Federal funds sold |
|
1,247 |
|
7,661 | ||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
46,402 |
|
38,915 | ||
Securities available for sale, at fair value |
|
272,755 |
|
257,062 | ||
Loans held for sale |
|
39,771 |
|
43,485 | ||
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
714,764 |
|
600,164 | ||
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
9,179 |
|
7,336 | ||
Net loans |
|
705,585 |
|
592,828 | ||
Bank premises and equipment, net |
|
21,577 |
|
19,191 | ||
Other real estate owned |
|
774 |
|
768 | ||
Other assets |
|
28,861 |
|
30,848 | ||
Total assets |
$ |
1,115,725 |
$ |
983,097 | ||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
$ |
134,172 |
$ |
110,913 | ||
Interest-bearing deposits: |
||||||
NOW accounts |
|
128,764 |
|
112,940 | ||
Money market accounts |
|
88,440 |
|
79,176 | ||
Savings accounts |
|
84,983 |
|
72,897 | ||
Time deposits of $100,000 and over |
|
152,968 |
|
133,629 | ||
Other time deposits |
|
308,315 |
|
274,529 | ||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
763,470 |
|
673,171 | ||
Total deposits |
|
897,642 |
|
784,084 | ||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
43,227 |
|
41,083 | ||
Other short-term borrowings |
|
1,550 |
|
| ||
Long-term borrowings |
|
62,219 |
|
62,731 | ||
Other liabilities |
|
5,595 |
|
6,220 | ||
Total liabilities |
|
1,010,233 |
|
894,118 | ||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||
Common stock, $2 par value. Authorized 24,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 7,579,707 shares in 2002 and 7,525,912 shares in 2001 |
|
15,159 |
|
15,052 | ||
Surplus |
|
1,442 |
|
446 | ||
Retained earnings |
|
81,997 |
|
71,419 | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
6,894 |
|
2,062 | ||
Total stockholders equity |
|
105,492 |
|
88,979 | ||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ |
1,115,725 |
$ |
983,097 | ||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
30
UNION BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|||||||||||
Interest and dividend income: |
|||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ |
50,693 |
|
$ |
51,333 |
$ |
50,811 |
| |||
Interest on Federal funds sold |
|
206 |
|
|
412 |
|
118 |
| |||
Interest on interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
17 |
|
|
37 |
|
59 |
| |||
Interest on money market investments |
|
40 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
| |||
Interest and dividends on securities: |
|||||||||||
Taxable |
|
9,619 |
|
|
9,125 |
|
8,979 |
| |||
Nontaxable |
|
4,630 |
|
|
4,646 |
|
4,900 |
| |||
Total interest and dividend income |
|
65,205 |
|
|
65,576 |
|
64,867 |
| |||
Interest expense: |
|||||||||||
Interest on deposits |
|
20,459 |
|
|
27,140 |
|
26,512 |
| |||
Interest on short-term borrowings |
|
475 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
2,451 |
| |||
Interest on long-term borrowings |
|
3,693 |
|
|
4,143 |
|
4,567 |
| |||
Total interest expense |
|
24,627 |
|
|
32,483 |
|
33,530 |
| |||
Net interest income |
|
40,578 |
|
|
33,093 |
|
31,337 |
| |||
Provision for loan losses |
|
2,878 |
|
|
2,126 |
|
2,101 |
| |||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
37,700 |
|
|
30,967 |
|
29,236 |
| |||
Noninterest in come: |
|||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
4,088 |
|
|
3,665 |
|
3,623 |
| |||
Other service charges, commissions and fees |
|
2,563 |
|
|
2,488 |
|
2,163 |
| |||
Gains (losses) on securities transactions, net |
|
(159 |
) |
|
125 |
|
(957 |
) | |||
Gains on sales of loans |
|
10,089 |
|
|
8,857 |
|
5,516 |
| |||
Gains on sales of other real estate owned and bank premises, net |
|
157 |
|
|
51 |
|
81 |
| |||
Gain on termination of pension plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,087 |
| |||
Other operating income |
|
800 |
|
|
906 |
|
498 |
| |||
Total noninterest income |
|
17,538 |
|
|
16,092 |
|
12,011 |
| |||
Noninterest expenses: |
|||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
|
21,326 |
|
|
19,102 |
|
18,729 |
| |||
Occupancy expenses |
|
2,318 |
|
|
2,179 |
|
2,300 |
| |||
Furniture and equipment expenses |
|
2,742 |
|
|
2,859 |
|
2,956 |
| |||
Other operating expenses |
|
9,536 |
|
|
8,307 |
|
8,439 |
| |||
Total noninterest expenses |
|
35,922 |
|
|
32,447 |
|
32,424 |
| |||
Income before income taxes |
|
19,316 |
|
|
14,612 |
|
8,823 |
| |||
Income tax expense |
|
4,811 |
|
|
2,933 |
|
1,223 |
| |||
Net income |
$ |
14,505 |
|
$ |
11,679 |
$ |
7,600 |
| |||
Earnings per share, basic |
$ |
1.92 |
|
$ |
1.55 |
$ |
1.01 |
| |||
Earnings per share, diluted |
$ |
1.90 |
|
$ |
1.55 |
$ |
1.01 |
| |||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
31
UNION BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000
Common Stock |
Surplus Earnings |
Retained Income |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
BalanceDecember 31, 1999 |
$ |
14,976 |
|
$ |
163 |
|
$ |
58,603 |
|
$ |
(4,948 |
) |
$ |
68,794 |
| |||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income2000 |
|
7,600 |
|
$ |
7,600 |
|
|
7,600 |
| |||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period (net of tax, $2,077) |
|
4,031 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (net of tax, $325) |
|
632 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (net of tax, $2,402) |
|
4,663 |
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
4,663 |
| |||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ |
12,263 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends2000 ($.40 per share) |
|
(3,002 |
) |
|
(3,002 |
) | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock under Dividend Reinvestment Plan (35,092 shares) |
|
70 |
|
|
276 |
|
|
346 |
| |||||||||||||||
Stock repurchased under Stock Repurchase Plan (30,300 shares) |
|
(61 |
) |
|
(269 |
) |